FBGKX vs. FTEC
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC).
FBGKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. FTEC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013.
Performance
FBGKX vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBGKX vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGKX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K | -11.14% | 19.99% | 39.87% | 55.76% | -38.40% | 22.74% | 62.35% | 33.56% | 1.11% | 36.08% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | -7.30% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -29.59% | 30.49% | 45.83% | 48.93% | -0.39% | 36.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBGKX achieves a -11.14% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's -7.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FBGKX has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 18.65%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 21.13% annualized return.
FBGKX
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- -11.14%
- 6M
- -8.01%
- 1Y
- 22.62%
- 3Y*
- 24.77%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 18.65%
FTEC
- 1D
- 4.32%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- -7.30%
- 6M
- -6.15%
- 1Y
- 29.59%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- 14.76%
- 10Y*
- 21.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBGKX vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBGKX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FBGKX vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
FBGKX
FTEC
FBGKX vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBGKX | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 1.08 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 1.66 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 1.81 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 5.63 | -0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBGKX | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.08 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.59 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.86 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.85 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBGKX and FTEC is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FBGKX vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
FBGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than FTEC's 0.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGKX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K | 2.12% | 1.89% | 6.00% | 0.93% | 0.56% | 8.77% | 6.41% | 3.70% | 6.41% | 4.26% | 4.22% | 5.36% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
FBGKX vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBGKX drawdown since its inception was -48.90%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGKX and FTEC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBGKX | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.90% | -34.95% | -13.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.89% | -16.26% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.03% | -34.95% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.03% | -34.95% | -8.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.63% | -12.65% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.43% | -5.61% | -2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 5.22% | -1.61% |
Volatility
FBGKX vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) is 6.14%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 7.97%. This indicates that FBGKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBGKX | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | 7.97% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.36% | 16.35% | -2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.68% | 27.51% | -2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 25.12% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.58% | 24.57% | -0.99% |