PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBGKX vs. FFEZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBGKX vs. FFEZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBGKX achieves a 18.59% return, which is significantly higher than FFEZX's 9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FBGKX has outperformed FFEZX with an annualized return of 21.98%, while FFEZX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.41% annualized return.


FBGKX

1D
0.76%
1M
9.11%
YTD
18.59%
6M
19.80%
1Y
45.08%
3Y*
32.64%
5Y*
17.17%
10Y*
21.98%

FFEZX

1D
0.28%
1M
4.03%
YTD
9.00%
6M
9.57%
1Y
21.69%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGKX vs. FFEZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBGKX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K
18.59%19.99%39.87%55.76%-38.40%22.74%62.35%33.56%1.11%36.08%
FFEZX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class
9.00%17.36%11.27%17.31%-17.55%13.80%15.58%24.92%-6.72%20.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FBGKX and FFEZX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.86

The correlation between FBGKX and FFEZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBGKX vs. FFEZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGKX
FBGKX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FBGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FFEZX
FFEZX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FFEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGKX vs. FFEZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBGKXFFEZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.47

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.15

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.65

13.76

+1.90

FBGKX vs. FFEZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBGKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the FFEZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBGKX and FFEZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBGKXFFEZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

2.49

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.65

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.78

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.70

0.00

Drawdowns

FBGKX vs. FFEZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBGKX drawdown since its inception was -48.90%, which is greater than FFEZX's maximum drawdown of -28.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGKX and FFEZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBGKXFFEZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.90%

-28.46%

-20.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.63%

-6.95%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.06%

-11.02%

-16.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.03%

-24.83%

-18.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.03%

-28.46%

-14.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-4.50%

-3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

1.59%

+1.39%

Volatility

FBGKX vs. FFEZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEZX) at 2.81%. This indicates that FBGKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFEZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBGKXFFEZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

2.81%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.01%

7.14%

+5.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.47%

8.81%

+8.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.87%

11.90%

+12.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.68%

13.36%

+10.32%

FBGKX vs. FFEZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGKX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FFEZX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBGKX vs. FFEZX - Dividend Comparison

FBGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than FFEZX's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBGKX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K
1.59%1.89%6.00%0.93%0.56%8.77%6.41%3.70%6.41%4.26%4.22%5.36%
FFEZX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class
2.58%2.80%2.54%2.13%2.08%2.04%2.18%16.18%2.27%1.85%2.01%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBGKX and FFEZX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBGKX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to FFEZX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBGKX dropped -48.90% vs FFEZX's -28.46%.

FBGKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBGKX and FFEZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer