PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFEZX vs. TRRJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFEZX vs. TRRJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEZX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFEZX having a 8.69% return and TRRJX slightly higher at 8.90%. Over the past 10 years, FFEZX has outperformed TRRJX with an annualized return of 10.38%, while TRRJX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.78% annualized return.


FFEZX

1D
0.24%
1M
3.37%
YTD
8.69%
6M
9.59%
1Y
21.50%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
10.38%

TRRJX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.87%
YTD
8.90%
6M
4.95%
1Y
15.67%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFEZX vs. TRRJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFEZX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class
8.69%17.36%11.27%17.31%-17.55%13.80%15.58%24.92%-6.72%20.40%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
8.90%10.96%11.99%18.14%-17.96%15.21%17.04%23.72%-6.95%20.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FFEZX and TRRJX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.97

The correlation between FFEZX and TRRJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFEZX vs. TRRJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFEZX
FFEZX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FFEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRJX
TRRJX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TRRJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFEZX vs. TRRJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEZX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFEZXTRRJXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

1.59

+0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

2.18

+1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.31

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

1.95

+1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.76

7.64

+6.12

FFEZX vs. TRRJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFEZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the TRRJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFEZX and TRRJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFEZXTRRJXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.59

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.51

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.73

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.50

+0.20

Drawdowns

FFEZX vs. TRRJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFEZX drawdown since its inception was -28.46%, smaller than the maximum TRRJX drawdown of -53.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEZX and TRRJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFEZXTRRJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.46%

-53.57%

+25.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-8.06%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.02%

-12.52%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.83%

-25.85%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.46%

-30.14%

+1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-6.65%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

2.06%

-0.47%

Volatility

FFEZX vs. TRRJX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEZX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFEZXTRRJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.95%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

8.88%

-1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.82%

10.46%

-1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.90%

12.83%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.36%

13.54%

-0.18%

FFEZX vs. TRRJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFEZX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TRRJX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFEZX vs. TRRJX - Dividend Comparison

FFEZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, while TRRJX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFEZX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class
2.59%2.80%2.54%2.13%2.08%2.04%2.18%16.18%2.27%1.85%2.01%2.04%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
0.00%0.00%2.36%4.68%9.67%6.89%4.80%5.68%8.55%3.80%2.89%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FFEZX and TRRJX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRRJX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to FFEZX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFEZX dropped -28.46% vs TRRJX's -53.57%.

FFEZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFEZX and TRRJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer