FBGKX vs. AAAU

Last updated Jul 31, 2026

FBGKX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K) and AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) are both funds - FBGKX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while AAAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. FBGKX is actively managed, while AAAU is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FBGKX returned 12.89%/yr vs 17.54%/yr for AAAU. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FBGKX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AAAU.

Performance

FBGKX vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBGKX achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly higher than AAAU's -4.77% return.

FBGKX

• 1D: -2.13%
• 1M: -9.02%
• 6M: 5.66%
• YTD: 6.84%
• 1Y: 18.19%
• 3Y*: 24.19%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 20.31%
• ALL TIME*: 15.51%

AAAU

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: 2.40%
• 6M: -23.85%
• YTD: -4.77%
• 1Y: 25.49%
• 3Y*: 27.68%
• 5Y*: 17.54%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	$44.00M	$44.27M	$64.81M
FBGKX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FBGKX vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FBGKX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K	6.84%	19.99%	39.87%	55.76%	-38.40%	22.74%	62.35%	33.56%	-13.58%
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	-4.77%	64.06%	26.91%	12.96%	-0.50%	-4.01%	25.02%	18.17%	8.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FBGKX and AAAU is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2018	0.09

The correlation between FBGKX and AAAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FBGKX vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FBGKX

FBGKX Risk / Return Rank: 29
FBGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FBGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FBGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FBGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FBGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

AAAU

AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 35
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 42
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FBGKX vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBGKX	AAAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	0.92	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	1.29	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.19	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	0.97	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.44	2.13	+3.31

FBGKX vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBGKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBGKX and AAAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBGKX vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBGKX drawdown since its inception was -48.90%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -26.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGKX and AAAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBGKX	AAAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.90%	-26.29%	-22.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.63%	-26.29%	+13.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.06%	-26.29%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.03%	-26.29%	-16.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.59%	-23.85%	+13.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.32%	-6.52%	-1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	12.02%	-8.52%

Volatility

FBGKX vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) have volatilities of 5.94% and 6.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBGKX	AAAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.94%	6.13%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.81%	23.25%	-7.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.87%	27.86%	-7.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.20%	18.31%	+6.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.81%	17.23%	+6.58%

FBGKX vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGKX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBGKX vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

FBGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBGKX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K	1.77%	1.89%	6.00%	0.93%	0.56%	8.77%	6.41%	3.70%	6.41%	4.26%	4.22%	5.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBGKX and AAAU in my portfolio?

FBGKX and AAAU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBGKX or AAAU?

AAAU has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to FBGKX (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBGKX dropped -48.90% vs AAAU's -26.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.