PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBFZX vs. FSRKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBFZX vs. FSRKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Managed Income Fund (FBFZX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBFZX achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than FSRKX's 6.77% return.


FBFZX

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
5.76%
6M
5.65%
1Y
13.65%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
7.55%

FSRKX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
6.77%
6M
6.89%
1Y
12.82%
3Y*
9.03%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBFZX vs. FSRKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FBFZX
Franklin Managed Income Fund
5.76%9.23%5.14%7.90%-6.96%15.46%5.60%8.81%
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
6.77%10.59%6.00%4.81%-3.13%16.06%3.94%1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FBFZX and FSRKX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019

0.69

The correlation between FBFZX and FSRKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBFZX vs. FSRKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBFZX
FBFZX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FBFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FBFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRKX
FSRKX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FSRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBFZX vs. FSRKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Managed Income Fund (FBFZX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBFZXFSRKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.50

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

4.97

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.23

19.90

-6.67

FBFZX vs. FSRKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBFZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the FSRKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBFZX and FSRKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBFZX vs. FSRKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBFZX drawdown since its inception was -49.53%, which is greater than FSRKX's maximum drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBFZX and FSRKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBFZXFSRKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.53%

-19.93%

-29.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.85%

-2.57%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.28%

-5.84%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.44%

-12.74%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-2.57%

+1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-3.20%

-3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.64%

+0.40%

Volatility

FBFZX vs. FSRKX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Managed Income Fund (FBFZX) has a higher volatility of 1.81% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6 (FSRKX) at 1.32%. This indicates that FBFZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBFZXFSRKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

1.32%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.04%

3.78%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.32%

4.87%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.92%

6.94%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.82%

7.78%

+1.04%

FBFZX vs. FSRKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBFZX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBFZX vs. FSRKX - Dividend Comparison

FBFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than FSRKX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBFZX
Franklin Managed Income Fund
4.26%3.61%6.01%4.69%4.49%7.28%4.66%11.18%4.64%4.77%4.70%3.59%
FSRKX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund Class K6
4.33%4.83%4.98%5.38%7.38%5.43%2.31%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBFZX and FSRKX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBFZX has higher volatility (1.81%) compared to FSRKX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBFZX dropped -49.53% vs FSRKX's -19.93%.

FSRKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBFZX and FSRKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer