FBDC vs. PFI
FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) and PFI (Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while PFI is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Financials Technical Leaders Index. FBDC is actively managed, while PFI is passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBDC charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PFI.
Performance
FBDC vs. PFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBDC achieves a -7.17% return, which is significantly lower than PFI's 1.68% return.
FBDC
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -7.17%
- 6M
- -8.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFI
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 6.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
FBDC vs. PFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | -7.17% | -2.43% |
PFI Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF | 1.68% | 2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBDC and PFI is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBDC vs. PFI — Risk / Return Rank
FBDC
PFI
FBDC vs. PFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF (PFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBDC | PFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.56 | 0.25 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
FBDC vs. PFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum PFI drawdown of -59.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDC and PFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBDC | PFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.60% | -59.53% | +38.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.10% | -5.99% | -9.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.16% | -14.50% | +4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.62% | — |
Volatility
FBDC vs. PFI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBDC | PFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 18.90% | -0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 21.96% | -3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 22.25% | -4.03% |
FBDC vs. PFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBDC has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PFI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBDC vs. PFI - Dividend Comparison
FBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.23%, more than PFI's 0.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | 11.23% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFI Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momentum ETF | 0.70% | 0.68% | 2.77% | 1.85% | 1.93% | 1.28% | 1.56% | 0.92% | 1.98% | 0.35% | 2.16% | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBDC and PFI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PFI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PFI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.
FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.23%, compared with 0.70% for PFI.
FBDC is categorized as Financials Equities, while PFI is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for FBDC and 0.60% for PFI.
Find the right allocation for FBDC and PFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer