FBDC vs. MUU

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - FBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). FBDC is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. Over the past year, FBDC returned -12.09% vs 2796.55% for MUU. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBDC charges 1.35%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

FBDC vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBDC achieves a -6.46% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 575.80% return.

FBDC

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 1.39%
• 6M: -7.11%
• YTD: -6.46%
• 1Y: -12.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: -9.01%
• 1M: -18.36%
• 6M: 372.65%
• YTD: 575.80%
• 1Y: 2,796.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBDC vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	-6.46%	-2.66%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	575.80%	324.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FBDC and MUU is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025	0.05

Return for Risk

FBDC vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBDC

FBDC Risk / Return Rank: 4
FBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBDC vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBDC	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	23.95	-24.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.84	5.62	-6.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.69	-0.79
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	66.09	-66.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.97	221.31	-222.28

FBDC vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBDC Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 23.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBDC and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBDC vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDC and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBDC	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.60%	-75.07%	+54.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.60%	-52.72%	+32.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.45%	-36.32%	+21.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.69%	-23.43%	+12.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.11%	16.57%	-4.46%

Volatility

FBDC vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) is 4.07%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.81%. This indicates that FBDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBDC	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	67.81%	-63.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.76%	116.35%	-101.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.98%	145.78%	-127.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.87%	138.10%	-120.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.87%	138.10%	-120.23%

FBDC vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBDC has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBDC vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

FBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.29%, more than MUU's 0.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	12.29%	5.41%	0.00%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.70%	4.27%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBDC and MUU in my portfolio?

FBDC and MUU have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBDC or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (67.81%) compared to FBDC (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBDC dropped -20.60% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, FBDC or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 2796.55% vs -12.09% for FBDC. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, FBDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBDC or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 2796.55% return vs -12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBDC or MUU?

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBDC or MUU?

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 12.29%, compared with 0.70% for MUU.

What is the main difference between FBDC and MUU?

FBDC is categorized as Financials Equities, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for FBDC and 1.01% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (23.95 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.