PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBDC vs. FTXO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBDC vs. FTXO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBDC achieves a -4.10% return, which is significantly lower than FTXO's 14.79% return.


FBDC

1D
1.74%
1M
4.48%
6M
-6.58%
YTD
-4.10%
1Y
-11.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTXO

1D
1.21%
1M
5.78%
6M
13.05%
YTD
14.79%
1Y
29.53%
3Y*
27.38%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBDC vs. FTXO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FBDC and FTXO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBDC vs. FTXO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBDC
FBDC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXO
FTXO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FTXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBDC vs. FTXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBDCFTXODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.25

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

1.78

-2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.93

4.91

-5.84

FBDC vs. FTXO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBDC Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the FTXO Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBDC and FTXO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBDC vs. FTXO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum FTXO drawdown of -55.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDC and FTXO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBDCFTXODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-55.26%

+34.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.60%

-16.69%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.29%

0.00%

-12.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.74%

-15.70%

+4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.23%

6.03%

+6.20%

Volatility

FBDC vs. FTXO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) is 4.45%, while First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that FBDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBDCFTXODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

5.21%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

15.87%

-1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.06%

20.75%

-2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

26.80%

-8.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

29.88%

-12.02%

FBDC vs. FTXO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBDC has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBDC vs. FTXO - Dividend Comparison

FBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.99%, more than FTXO's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FBDC
FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF
11.99%5.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTXO
First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF
1.69%1.92%2.18%3.20%2.94%1.64%2.74%2.53%3.51%1.09%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBDC and FTXO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXO has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to FBDC (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBDC dropped -20.60% vs FTXO's -55.26%.

On 1-year performance, FTXO leads with 29.53% vs -11.30% for FBDC. On fees, FTXO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FBDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTXO has performed better with a 29.53% return vs -11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTXO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.99%, compared with 1.69% for FTXO.

Their fees differ too: 1.35% for FBDC and 0.60% for FTXO.

FTXO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBDC and FTXO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer