PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBDAX vs. EINFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBDAX vs. EINFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Total Return Fund (FBDAX) and Elfun Income Fund (EINFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBDAX vs. EINFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBDAX
Franklin Total Return Fund
-0.59%7.17%2.00%6.00%-14.70%-0.59%7.39%9.78%-1.56%3.71%
EINFX
Elfun Income Fund
-0.45%7.35%-0.73%4.75%-13.82%-1.57%7.81%9.51%-0.86%3.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBDAX achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than EINFX's -0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FBDAX has outperformed EINFX with an annualized return of 1.77%, while EINFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.45% annualized return.


FBDAX

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
-0.59%
6M
0.20%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
0.09%
10Y*
1.77%

EINFX

1D
0.21%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
0.30%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
2.51%
5Y*
-0.58%
10Y*
1.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBDAX vs. EINFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBDAX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than EINFX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FBDAX vs. EINFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBDAX
FBDAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FBDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FBDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

EINFX
EINFX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EINFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
EINFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBDAX vs. EINFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Total Return Fund (FBDAX) and Elfun Income Fund (EINFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBDAXEINFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.78

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

1.12

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.41

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.99

3.78

+1.22

FBDAX vs. EINFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBDAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the EINFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBDAX and EINFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBDAXEINFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.78

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

-0.09

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.28

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.79

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between FBDAX and EINFX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FBDAX vs. EINFX - Dividend Comparison

FBDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than EINFX's 3.49% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBDAX
Franklin Total Return Fund
4.12%4.37%4.05%3.36%3.56%2.48%3.18%4.12%3.03%2.30%1.85%3.56%
EINFX
Elfun Income Fund
3.49%3.84%3.04%2.76%4.09%3.31%3.15%2.78%2.88%2.42%3.34%2.87%

Drawdowns

FBDAX vs. EINFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBDAX drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, roughly equal to the maximum EINFX drawdown of -19.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDAX and EINFX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBDAXEINFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.02%

-19.78%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-3.07%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.02%

-19.78%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.02%

-19.78%

-0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-5.73%

+2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-3.57%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.15%

-0.22%

Volatility

FBDAX vs. EINFX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Total Return Fund (FBDAX) and Elfun Income Fund (EINFX) have volatilities of 1.56% and 1.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBDAXEINFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

1.62%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.56%

2.76%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

4.85%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.81%

6.47%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

5.22%

-0.16%