PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBCVX vs. TORYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBCVX vs. TORYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) and Torray Fund (TORYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCVX achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly higher than TORYX's 10.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FBCVX having a 10.08% annualized return and TORYX not far behind at 9.76%.


FBCVX

1D
0.26%
1M
4.71%
YTD
18.91%
6M
18.13%
1Y
30.95%
3Y*
14.92%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
10.08%

TORYX

1D
0.34%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
10.28%
6M
9.63%
1Y
20.96%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCVX vs. TORYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBCVX
Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund
18.91%11.14%4.91%7.07%1.54%25.04%-4.72%21.71%-9.19%14.88%
TORYX
Torray Fund
10.28%14.89%13.77%12.57%-0.69%21.40%-2.45%19.89%-10.59%12.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCVX and TORYX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2003

0.88

The correlation between FBCVX and TORYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBCVX vs. TORYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCVX
FBCVX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FBCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

TORYX
TORYX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TORYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TORYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TORYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
TORYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TORYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCVX vs. TORYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) and Torray Fund (TORYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBCVXTORYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.34

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

4.72

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.30

13.67

-0.37

FBCVX vs. TORYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the TORYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCVX and TORYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBCVX vs. TORYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCVX drawdown since its inception was -63.75%, which is greater than TORYX's maximum drawdown of -56.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCVX and TORYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBCVXTORYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.75%

-56.55%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-4.50%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

-14.64%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.82%

-16.53%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.65%

-38.31%

-3.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.03%

+3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-7.33%

-3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

1.55%

+0.79%

Volatility

FBCVX vs. TORYX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Torray Fund (TORYX) at 3.75%. This indicates that FBCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TORYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBCVXTORYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

3.75%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

7.78%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.84%

11.05%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

15.13%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

17.63%

-0.52%

FBCVX vs. TORYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCVX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than TORYX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBCVX vs. TORYX - Dividend Comparison

FBCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than TORYX's 29.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBCVX
Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund
2.48%2.94%9.31%3.64%2.59%1.26%1.07%1.75%1.47%1.11%1.05%1.82%
TORYX
Torray Fund
29.97%32.38%7.32%6.47%10.55%10.80%3.22%2.66%2.21%7.34%8.93%4.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBCVX and TORYX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBCVX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to TORYX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCVX dropped -63.75% vs TORYX's -56.55%.

FBCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBCVX and TORYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer