PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBALX vs. TBLYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBALX vs. TBLYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund (TBLYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBALX achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly higher than TBLYX's 7.90% return.


FBALX

1D
1.52%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
8.71%
6M
9.51%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
15.96%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
11.70%

TBLYX

1D
1.86%
1M
0.08%
YTD
7.90%
6M
8.49%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBALX vs. TBLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
8.71%15.11%16.09%20.31%-18.29%4.81%
TBLYX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund
7.90%17.30%12.43%18.44%-17.17%4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FBALX and TBLYX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2021

0.94

The correlation between FBALX and TBLYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBALX vs. TBLYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBALX
FBALX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TBLYX
TBLYX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TBLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBALX vs. TBLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund (TBLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBALXTBLYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.36

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

2.51

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.08

10.93

+5.15

FBALX vs. TBLYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBALX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the TBLYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBALX and TBLYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBALX vs. TBLYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBALX drawdown since its inception was -43.57%, which is greater than TBLYX's maximum drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBALX and TBLYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBALXTBLYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.57%

-24.54%

-19.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-7.83%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

-13.02%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-1.58%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-6.07%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

1.80%

-0.42%

Volatility

FBALX vs. TBLYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) is 3.69%, while T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund (TBLYX) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that FBALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBLYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBALXTBLYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

4.08%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.41%

8.52%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

10.34%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.24%

13.11%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.81%

13.11%

-0.30%

FBALX vs. TBLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBALX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than TBLYX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBALX vs. TBLYX - Dividend Comparison

FBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than TBLYX's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
5.22%5.69%5.67%2.28%8.06%9.66%5.90%4.24%10.99%7.90%3.07%7.70%
TBLYX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund
2.32%2.50%2.05%1.94%2.18%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FBALX and TBLYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TBLYX has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to FBALX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBALX dropped -43.57% vs TBLYX's -24.54%.

FBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBALX and TBLYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer