PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBALX vs. SICIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBALX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBALX achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly higher than SICIX's 2.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FBALX has outperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 11.77%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.46% annualized return.


FBALX

1D
0.23%
1M
4.04%
YTD
10.30%
6M
10.50%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
11.77%

SICIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
2.46%
6M
2.86%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
3.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBALX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
10.30%15.11%16.09%20.31%-18.29%18.27%22.45%24.40%-3.98%16.52%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.46%8.12%5.52%5.29%-6.23%4.13%2.62%9.36%-2.07%5.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FBALX and SICIX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2003

0.79

The correlation between FBALX and SICIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBALX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBALX
FBALX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SICIX
SICIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBALX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBALXSICIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.97

2.53

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.18

3.73

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.48

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

2.76

+1.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.87

10.77

+8.09

FBALX vs. SICIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBALX Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the SICIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBALX and SICIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBALXSICIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

2.53

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.84

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.89

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.80

+0.02

Drawdowns

FBALX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBALX drawdown since its inception was -43.57%, which is greater than SICIX's maximum drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBALX and SICIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBALXSICIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.57%

-27.62%

-15.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-2.65%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

-3.21%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.89%

-10.94%

-11.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.68%

-11.61%

-15.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.35%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-3.57%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

0.68%

+0.67%

Volatility

FBALX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Balanced Fund (FBALX) has a higher volatility of 2.58% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 0.73%. This indicates that FBALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBALXSICIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

0.73%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.80%

2.11%

+4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.58%

2.81%

+5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.18%

3.88%

+8.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.78%

3.90%

+8.88%

FBALX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FBALX and SICIX have an expense ratio of 0.51%.


Dividends

FBALX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison

FBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than SICIX's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBALX
Fidelity Balanced Fund
5.14%5.69%5.67%2.28%8.06%9.66%5.90%4.24%10.99%7.90%3.07%7.70%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.84%2.87%3.67%2.80%4.69%3.46%1.84%2.91%1.80%1.81%1.64%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBALX and SICIX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBALX has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to SICIX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBALX dropped -43.57% vs SICIX's -27.62%.

FBALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBALX and SICIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer