PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBAKX vs. VGSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBAKX vs. VGSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K (FBAKX) and Vanguard STAR Fund (VGSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBAKX achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than VGSTX's 6.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FBAKX has outperformed VGSTX with an annualized return of 11.81%, while VGSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.65% annualized return.


FBAKX

1D
0.23%
1M
4.06%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.56%
1Y
25.07%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
11.81%

VGSTX

1D
0.10%
1M
3.50%
YTD
6.45%
6M
7.04%
1Y
18.40%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
6.81%
10Y*
9.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBAKX vs. VGSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBAKX
Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K
10.34%15.19%16.17%20.40%-18.22%18.40%22.51%23.94%-3.89%16.62%
VGSTX
Vanguard STAR Fund
6.45%15.88%13.69%17.14%-18.05%9.65%21.45%22.21%-5.33%16.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FBAKX and VGSTX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2008

0.96

The correlation between FBAKX and VGSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBAKX vs. VGSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBAKX
FBAKX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FBAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FBAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VGSTX
VGSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VGSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VGSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBAKX vs. VGSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K (FBAKX) and Vanguard STAR Fund (VGSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBAKXVGSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.41

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

2.77

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.03

12.06

+6.97

FBAKX vs. VGSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBAKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the VGSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBAKX and VGSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBAKXVGSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

2.21

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.58

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.82

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.81

-0.13

Drawdowns

FBAKX vs. VGSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBAKX drawdown since its inception was -41.40%, which is greater than VGSTX's maximum drawdown of -38.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAKX and VGSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBAKXVGSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.40%

-38.62%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-6.76%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.85%

-11.77%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.84%

-25.55%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.68%

-25.55%

-1.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-4.03%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

1.55%

-0.21%

Volatility

FBAKX vs. VGSTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K (FBAKX) and Vanguard STAR Fund (VGSTX) have volatilities of 2.57% and 2.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBAKXVGSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

2.46%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.80%

6.69%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.59%

8.47%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.18%

11.82%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.78%

11.83%

+0.95%

FBAKX vs. VGSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBAKX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VGSTX's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBAKX vs. VGSTX - Dividend Comparison

FBAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, less than VGSTX's 8.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBAKX
Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K
5.17%5.72%5.74%2.35%8.15%9.74%5.97%3.87%11.09%7.98%3.16%7.79%
VGSTX
Vanguard STAR Fund
8.57%9.13%10.67%5.35%8.34%6.70%6.68%6.07%6.90%3.32%4.77%5.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FBAKX and VGSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FBAKX has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to VGSTX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBAKX dropped -41.40% vs VGSTX's -38.62%.

FBAKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBAKX and VGSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer