FBAKX vs. FRGAX
FBAKX (Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K) and FRGAX (Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, FBAKX returned 16.87%/yr vs 16.33%/yr for FRGAX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FBAKX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FRGAX.
Performance
FBAKX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBAKX achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than FRGAX's 9.37% return.
FBAKX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 25.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
FRGAX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 9.37%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBAKX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBAKX Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K | 10.34% | 15.19% | 16.17% | 20.40% | -2.63% |
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 9.37% | 17.10% | 12.91% | 17.57% | -1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBAKX and FRGAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FBAKX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBAKX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank
FBAKX
FRGAX
FBAKX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K (FBAKX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBAKX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.48 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 3.27 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.03 | 14.61 | +4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBAKX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | 2.55 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 1.54 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
FBAKX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBAKX drawdown since its inception was -41.40%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAKX and FRGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBAKX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.40% | -11.77% | -29.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -7.03% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.85% | -11.77% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -1.58% | -3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | 1.57% | -0.23% |
Volatility
FBAKX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K (FBAKX) is 2.57%, while Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that FBAKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBAKX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 2.75% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.80% | 7.19% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.59% | 9.03% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.18% | 10.31% | +1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 10.31% | +2.47% |
FBAKX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBAKX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBAKX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison
FBAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than FRGAX's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBAKX Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K | 5.17% | 5.72% | 5.74% | 2.35% | 8.15% | 9.74% | 5.97% | 3.87% | 11.09% | 7.98% | 3.16% | 7.79% |
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 1.83% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.77% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, FBAKX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FRGAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to FBAKX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBAKX dropped -41.40% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.
FBAKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBAKX and FRGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer