PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FB vs. NFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FB vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FB achieves a 6.87% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -26.46% return.


FB

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.15%
6M
6.11%
YTD
6.87%
1Y
12.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFLX

1D
-7.26%
1M
-10.41%
6M
-21.65%
YTD
-26.46%
1Y
-45.89%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
23.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FB vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FB
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF
6.87%6.10%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-26.46%-26.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FB and NFLX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FB vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FB
FB Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FB Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FB Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FB vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBNFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

0.74

+0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.06

-1.01

+8.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.48

-1.85

+27.32

FB vs. NFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FB Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the NFLX Sharpe Ratio of -1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FB and NFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FB vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FB drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum NFLX drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FB and NFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBNFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-81.99%

+80.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.76%

-45.42%

+43.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-48.51%

+48.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-24.98%

+24.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

25.45%

-24.96%

Volatility

FB vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) is 1.56%, while Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) has a volatility of 13.37%. This indicates that FB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBNFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

13.37%

-11.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

27.76%

-24.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96%

35.09%

-30.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.03%

43.47%

-38.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

41.58%

-36.55%

Dividends

FB vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison

FB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
FB
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF
1.99%0.92%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FB and NFLX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFLX has higher volatility (13.37%) compared to FB (1.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FB dropped -1.76% vs NFLX's -81.99%.

FB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FB and NFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer