PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FB vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FB vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FB achieves a 6.87% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -18.21% return.


FB

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.15%
6M
6.11%
YTD
6.87%
1Y
12.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSFT

1D
-1.82%
1M
3.93%
6M
-13.98%
YTD
-18.21%
1Y
-22.42%
3Y*
3.89%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
23.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FB vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FB
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF
6.87%6.10%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-18.21%-1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FB and MSFT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FB vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FB
FB Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FB Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FB Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FB vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

0.87

+0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.06

-0.65

+7.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.48

-1.20

+26.68

FB vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FB Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FB and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FB vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FB drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FB and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-69.38%

+67.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.76%

-34.50%

+32.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-26.89%

+26.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-21.80%

+21.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

18.67%

-18.18%

Volatility

FB vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (FB) is 1.56%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.85%. This indicates that FB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

10.85%

-9.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

24.41%

-20.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96%

27.40%

-22.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.03%

27.05%

-22.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.03%

27.19%

-22.16%

Dividends

FB vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

FB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than MSFT's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FB
ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF
1.99%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.90%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


FB and MSFT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFT has higher volatility (10.85%) compared to FB (1.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FB dropped -1.76% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

FB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FB and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer