FAZAX vs. URFFX

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

FAZAX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class A) and URFFX (USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FAZAX returned 9.14%/yr vs 9.23%/yr for URFFX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FAZAX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for URFFX.

Performance

FAZAX vs. URFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class A (FAZAX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAZAX achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly lower than URFFX's 11.62% return.

FAZAX

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -3.01%
• 6M: 9.20%
• YTD: 11.01%
• 1Y: 21.59%
• 3Y*: 17.12%
• 5Y*: 9.14%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.92%

URFFX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -0.75%
• 6M: 10.11%
• YTD: 11.62%
• 1Y: 21.40%
• 3Y*: 16.13%
• 5Y*: 9.23%
• 10Y*: 10.03%
• ALL TIME*: 8.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAZAX vs. URFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FAZAX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class A	11.01%	22.31%	13.25%	20.15%	-19.21%	15.88%	17.57%	8.91%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	11.62%	19.35%	11.86%	18.12%	-15.66%	17.70%	10.52%	6.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FAZAX and URFFX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019	0.96

The correlation between FAZAX and URFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAZAX vs. URFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAZAX

FAZAX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FAZAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FAZAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FAZAX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FAZAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FAZAX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

URFFX

URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 76
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAZAX vs. URFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class A (FAZAX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAZAX	URFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.86	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.62	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.34	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	2.77	-0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.66	11.81	-2.14

FAZAX vs. URFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAZAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the URFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAZAX and URFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAZAX vs. URFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAZAX drawdown since its inception was -31.37%, smaller than the maximum URFFX drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAZAX and URFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAZAX	URFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.37%	-44.25%	+12.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-7.89%	-1.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.52%	-14.14%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.94%	-23.76%	-4.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.01%	-1.44%	-1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.08%	-5.89%	-0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	1.84%	+0.43%

Volatility

FAZAX vs. URFFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class A (FAZAX) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) at 2.84%. This indicates that FAZAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAZAX	URFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	2.84%	+1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.08%	9.78%	+2.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.04%	11.76%	+2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.31%	13.96%	+1.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.24%	14.33%	+2.91%

FAZAX vs. URFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAZAX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than URFFX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAZAX vs. URFFX - Dividend Comparison

FAZAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than URFFX's 5.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAZAX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2065 Fund Class A	3.20%	2.33%	2.69%	1.80%	5.18%	6.68%	3.33%	2.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	5.79%	6.46%	2.61%	3.39%	11.40%	8.13%	6.25%	11.76%	10.21%	5.55%	3.91%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAZAX and URFFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FAZAX and URFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FAZAX or URFFX?

FAZAX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to URFFX (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAZAX dropped -31.37% vs URFFX's -44.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.