FAZ vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FAZ (Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FAZ is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, FAZ returned -17.74% vs 1964.55% for INTW. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. FAZ charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

FAZ vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAZ achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.

FAZ

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: -12.03%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 5.46%
• 1Y: -17.74%
• 3Y*: -40.57%
• 5Y*: -30.61%
• 10Y*: -44.72%

INTW

• 1D: -12.49%
• 1M: 12.21%
• YTD: 750.22%
• 6M: 775.58%
• 1Y: 1,964.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAZ vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FAZ Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares	1.40%	-25.09%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	750.22%	60.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FAZ and INTW is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	-0.21

The correlation between FAZ and INTW shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (all time) to -0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FAZ vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAZ

FAZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
FAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAZ vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAZ	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	13.25	-13.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	5.13	-5.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.65	-0.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.56	40.32	-40.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	91.49	-92.76

FAZ vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 13.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAZ and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAZ vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAZ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAZ and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAZ	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-60.58%	-39.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.57%	-49.34%	+17.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-83.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-12.49%	-87.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-99.12%	-29.66%	-69.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.64%	21.70%	-7.06%

Volatility

FAZ vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares (FAZ) is 12.48%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 55.81%. This indicates that FAZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAZ	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.48%	55.81%	-43.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.25%	119.10%	-85.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.64%	150.14%	-106.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.67%	148.88%	-93.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.93%	148.88%	-86.95%

FAZ vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAZ has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAZ vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

FAZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FAZ Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares	3.35%	5.07%	7.34%	4.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	1.63%	0.56%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAZ and INTW in my portfolio?

FAZ and INTW have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAZ or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (55.81%) compared to FAZ (12.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAZ dropped -100.00% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, FAZ or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1964.55% vs -17.74% for FAZ. On fees, FAZ is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, FAZ has been the lower-risk option at 12.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAZ or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1964.55% return vs -17.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAZ or INTW?

FAZ is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAZ or INTW?

FAZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between FAZ and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for FAZ and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.25 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.