PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAX vs. EDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FAX vs. EDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc (FAX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FAX vs. EDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAX
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc
-2.95%18.23%2.31%16.53%-22.83%-7.20%14.08%19.48%-12.72%14.65%
EDF
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund
-0.34%22.24%25.54%21.63%-27.96%-8.47%-31.14%45.06%-18.24%24.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAX achieves a -2.95% return, which is significantly lower than EDF's -0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FAX has underperformed EDF with an annualized return of 2.82%, while EDF has yielded a comparatively higher 4.75% annualized return.


FAX

1D
1.34%
1M
-9.09%
YTD
-2.95%
6M
-5.62%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
9.50%
5Y*
0.61%
10Y*
2.82%

EDF

1D
-0.42%
1M
-5.17%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
1.72%
1Y
9.22%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
4.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAX vs. EDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAX has a 3.33% expense ratio, which is higher than EDF's 1.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FAX vs. EDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAX
FAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

EDF
EDF Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
EDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDF Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
EDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDF Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAX vs. EDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc (FAX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAXEDFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.31

0.52

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.48

0.76

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.11

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

0.63

-0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.04

2.90

-1.87

FAX vs. EDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the EDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAX and EDF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAXEDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

0.52

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.09

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.16

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.09

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between FAX and EDF is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FAX vs. EDF - Dividend Comparison

FAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.73%, less than EDF's 15.06% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAX
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc
13.73%12.91%13.45%12.18%12.55%8.64%7.42%8.29%10.85%8.61%9.07%9.19%
EDF
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund
15.06%14.49%15.32%16.71%17.31%12.91%16.46%15.67%19.37%13.58%14.75%17.93%

Drawdowns

FAX vs. EDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAX drawdown since its inception was -63.96%, roughly equal to the maximum EDF drawdown of -64.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAX and EDF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FAXEDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.96%

-64.23%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-14.17%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

-53.09%

+12.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.57%

-64.23%

+23.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.95%

-18.26%

+8.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.90%

-21.61%

+3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

3.40%

+0.89%

Volatility

FAX vs. EDF - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc (FAX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) have volatilities of 5.89% and 5.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FAXEDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

5.67%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

10.05%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.80%

17.96%

-4.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

25.87%

-9.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.45%

30.66%

-14.21%