FAVFX vs. NMAVX

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

FAVFX (Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class A) and NMAVX (Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FAVFX returned 12.54%/yr vs 8.18%/yr for NMAVX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAVFX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for NMAVX.

Performance

FAVFX vs. NMAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class A (FAVFX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAVFX achieves a 21.93% return, which is significantly higher than NMAVX's 10.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FAVFX has outperformed NMAVX with an annualized return of 12.54%, while NMAVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.18% annualized return.

FAVFX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 4.58%
• 6M: 21.93%
• YTD: 21.93%
• 1Y: 31.60%
• 3Y*: 18.77%
• 5Y*: 11.22%
• 10Y*: 12.54%

NMAVX

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 4.93%
• 6M: 10.33%
• YTD: 10.33%
• 1Y: 12.06%
• 3Y*: 6.28%
• 5Y*: 3.93%
• 10Y*: 8.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAVFX vs. NMAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class A	21.93%	10.98%	10.08%	19.41%	-9.38%	34.72%	9.52%	31.39%	-18.02%	15.01%
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund	10.33%	1.91%	5.20%	6.44%	-5.26%	11.10%	4.41%	30.71%	-5.44%	14.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FAVFX and NMAVX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.83

The correlation between FAVFX and NMAVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FAVFX vs. NMAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAVFX

FAVFX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FAVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FAVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FAVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FAVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FAVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

NMAVX

NMAVX Risk / Return Rank: 22
NMAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
NMAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
NMAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
NMAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
NMAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAVFX vs. NMAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class A (FAVFX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAVFX	NMAVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.08	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	1.67	+1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.19	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	1.28	+2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.22	3.20	+9.02

FAVFX vs. NMAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAVFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the NMAVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAVFX and NMAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAVFX vs. NMAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAVFX drawdown since its inception was -64.67%, which is greater than NMAVX's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAVFX and NMAVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAVFX	NMAVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.67%	-30.93%	-33.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.93%	-9.80%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.41%	-18.40%	-6.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.41%	-18.40%	-6.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.59%	-30.93%	-17.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.33%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.91%	-3.80%	-5.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	3.92%	-1.21%

Volatility

FAVFX vs. NMAVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class A (FAVFX) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) at 4.09%. This indicates that FAVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAVFX	NMAVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.34%	4.09%	+1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.13%	8.67%	+3.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.51%	11.82%	+4.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.52%	13.38%	+7.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.13%	14.95%	+7.18%

FAVFX vs. NMAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAVFX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NMAVX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAVFX vs. NMAVX - Dividend Comparison

FAVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.80%, more than NMAVX's 0.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAVFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class A	6.80%	8.29%	12.50%	0.81%	0.39%	4.47%	0.44%	3.05%	14.73%	3.23%	0.63%	1.85%
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund	0.86%	1.00%	7.55%	1.78%	9.05%	11.98%	0.61%	5.91%	7.16%	7.05%	1.83%	4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAVFX and NMAVX in my portfolio?

FAVFX and NMAVX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAVFX or NMAVX?

FAVFX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to NMAVX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAVFX dropped -64.67% vs NMAVX's -30.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.