FAUG vs. AIRR
FAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAUG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FAUG returned 8.87%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for AIRR. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAUG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
FAUG vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAUG achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 35.61% return.
FAUG
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 6.33%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 18.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 35.61%
- 6M
- 31.10%
- 1Y
- 71.43%
- 3Y*
- 37.98%
- 5Y*
- 27.26%
- 10Y*
- 22.39%
FAUG vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August | 6.33% | 13.77% | 14.55% | 17.24% | -10.52% | 11.54% | 12.43% | 2.03% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 35.61% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 31.43% | -2.08% | 33.01% | 17.17% | 0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAUG and AIRR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between FAUG and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
FAUG vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FAUG
AIRR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
FAUG
AIRR
Financial Services
FAUG
AIRR
Communication Services
FAUG
AIRR
-
Consumer Cyclical
FAUG
AIRR
-
Healthcare
FAUG
AIRR
-
Industrials
FAUG
AIRR
Consumer Defensive
FAUG
AIRR
-
Energy
FAUG
AIRR
Utilities
FAUG
AIRR
-
Real Estate
FAUG
AIRR
-
Basic Materials
FAUG
AIRR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAUG vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
FAUG
AIRR
FAUG vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAUG | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.43 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 5.49 | -2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.57 | 20.05 | -2.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAUG vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAUG drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAUG and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAUG | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -42.37% | +20.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.26% | -13.09% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.81% | -27.95% | +15.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.91% | -27.95% | +12.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -7.47% | +4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 3.57% | -2.53% |
Volatility
FAUG vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) is 1.70%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that FAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAUG | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.70% | 8.25% | -6.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.59% | 20.44% | -14.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.17% | 26.28% | -19.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.79% | 25.42% | -14.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 26.35% | -13.63% |
FAUG vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAUG vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
FAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
FAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAUG and AIRR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIRR has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to FAUG (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAUG dropped -22.33% vs AIRR's -42.37%.
On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 27.26% vs 8.87% for FAUG. On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, FAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 27.26% return vs 8.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIRR is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FAUG.
AIRR has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for FAUG.
FAUG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AIRR is Building & Construction. FAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FAUG and 0.69% for AIRR.
AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAUG and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer