FAUDX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FAUDX (Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FAUDX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FAUDX returned 21.22%/yr vs 21.79%/yr for FBGRX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FAUDX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund (FAUDX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAUDX achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 17.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FAUDX having a 21.22% annualized return and FBGRX not far ahead at 21.79%.

FAUDX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 0.28%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 2.55%
• 3Y*: 4.10%
• 5Y*: 2.52%
• 10Y*: 21.22%

FBGRX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 8.31%
• YTD: 17.66%
• 6M: 18.83%
• 1Y: 45.12%
• 3Y*: 32.21%
• 5Y*: 16.60%
• 10Y*: 21.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAUDX Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund	0.28%	3.89%	4.75%	5.45%	-1.41%	-0.06%	2.40%	468.65%	1.30%	1.65%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	17.66%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FAUDX and FBGRX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2012	0.01

The correlation between FAUDX and FBGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FAUDX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAUDX

FAUDX Risk / Return Rank: 67
FAUDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FAUDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FAUDX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FAUDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FAUDX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund (FAUDX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAUDX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.67	-0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	3.42	+0.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.45	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	3.62	-0.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.58	15.38	-3.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAUDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAUDX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAUDX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	2.67	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.64	0.67	+0.97
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.92	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.68	-0.26

Drawdowns

FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAUDX drawdown since its inception was -3.86%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAUDX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAUDX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.86%	-58.64%	+54.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.00%	-12.65%	+11.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.00%	-27.07%	+26.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-3.10%	-43.08%	+39.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-3.86%	-43.08%	+39.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	0.00%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.25%	-12.53%	+12.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.25%	2.98%	-2.73%

Volatility

FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund (FAUDX) is 0.56%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that FAUDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAUDX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.56%	4.14%	-3.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.06%	12.99%	-11.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50%	17.46%	-15.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.60%	24.88%	-23.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.32%	23.69%	+18.63%

FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAUDX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FAUDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than FBGRX's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAUDX Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund	3.24%	3.62%	4.03%	3.85%	1.50%	0.63%	1.48%	131.91%	2.30%	1.44%	1.40%	0.91%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.61%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAUDX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FAUDX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAUDX or FBGRX?

FBGRX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to FAUDX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAUDX dropped -3.86% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.