FAUDX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund (FAUDX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
FAUDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Performance
FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAUDX Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund | -0.50% | 3.89% | 4.75% | 5.45% | -1.41% | -0.06% | 2.40% | 468.65% | 1.30% | 1.65% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | -11.15% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | 1.02% | 36.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAUDX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FAUDX has outperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 21.20%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.55% annualized return.
FAUDX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -0.13%
- 1Y
- 2.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.40%
- 10Y*
- 21.20%
FBGRX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- -11.15%
- 6M
- -8.04%
- 1Y
- 22.53%
- 3Y*
- 24.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 18.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAUDX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAUDX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FAUDX
FBGRX
FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund (FAUDX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAUDX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 0.91 | +0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.84 | 1.43 | +1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.20 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 1.36 | +1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.00 | 5.44 | +7.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAUDX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 0.91 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.59 | 0.45 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.79 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.64 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAUDX and FBGRX is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FAUDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than FBGRX's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAUDX Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund | 2.60% | 3.62% | 4.03% | 3.85% | 1.50% | 0.63% | 1.48% | 131.91% | 2.30% | 1.44% | 1.40% | 0.91% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 2.14% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
Drawdowns
FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAUDX drawdown since its inception was -3.86%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAUDX and FBGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAUDX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -58.64% | +54.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.00% | -13.89% | +12.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.10% | -43.08% | +39.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.86% | -43.08% | +39.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -12.65% | +11.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -12.58% | +12.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 3.47% | -3.24% |
Volatility
FAUDX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strategic Advisers Short Duration Fund (FAUDX) is 0.51%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that FAUDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAUDX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | 6.13% | -5.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.04% | 13.36% | -12.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86% | 24.63% | -22.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.56% | 24.86% | -23.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.26% | 23.59% | +18.67% |