FATRX vs. TIBDX
FATRX (Frost Total Return Bond Fund Investor Class) and TIBDX (TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, FATRX returned 3.14%/yr vs 1.69%/yr for TIBDX. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FATRX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TIBDX.
Performance
FATRX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FATRX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than TIBDX's -0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FATRX has outperformed TIBDX with an annualized return of 3.14%, while TIBDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.69% annualized return.
FATRX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 5.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.02%
- 10Y*
- 3.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.51%
TIBDX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 4.04%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- 1.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FATRX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FATRX Frost Total Return Bond Fund Investor Class | 0.56% | 5.53% | 6.17% | 8.41% | -5.45% | 3.10% | 3.24% | 5.10% | 1.23% | 4.18% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | -0.27% | 7.38% | 1.95% | 5.63% | -13.68% | -0.95% | 8.10% | 9.57% | -0.64% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FATRX and TIBDX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2008 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FATRX and TIBDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.91 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FATRX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank
FATRX
TIBDX
FATRX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Total Return Bond Fund Investor Class (FATRX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FATRX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.18 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.26 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.26 | 3.43 | +0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FATRX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FATRX drawdown since its inception was -11.61%, smaller than the maximum TIBDX drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FATRX and TIBDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FATRX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.61% | -18.82% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.15% | -2.98% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.59% | -5.87% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.72% | -18.82% | +11.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.61% | -18.82% | +7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -2.14% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -2.30% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 1.09% | -0.30% |
Volatility
FATRX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison
Frost Total Return Bond Fund Investor Class (FATRX) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) at 0.80%. This indicates that FATRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FATRX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 0.80% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.52% | 2.98% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24% | 3.80% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 5.64% | -1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.23% | 4.74% | -1.51% |
FATRX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FATRX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FATRX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison
FATRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, more than TIBDX's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FATRX Frost Total Return Bond Fund Investor Class | 5.60% | 5.31% | 4.98% | 5.31% | 4.43% | 3.06% | 3.58% | 3.53% | 3.38% | 3.44% | 3.79% | 3.89% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 4.52% | 4.34% | 3.60% | 3.22% | 2.44% | 2.39% | 4.45% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 2.93% | 3.80% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FATRX and TIBDX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FATRX has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to TIBDX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FATRX dropped -11.61% vs TIBDX's -18.82%.
FATRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FATRX and TIBDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer