PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FATRX vs. LCTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FATRX vs. LCTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frost Total Return Bond Fund Investor Class (FATRX) and Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FATRX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than LCTRX's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FATRX has underperformed LCTRX with an annualized return of 3.14%, while LCTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.76% annualized return.


FATRX

1D
0.32%
1M
-1.02%
6M
0.15%
YTD
0.56%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
5.70%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
3.14%
ALL TIME*
4.51%

LCTRX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.27%
6M
1.59%
YTD
1.69%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
4.76%
ALL TIME*
3.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FATRX vs. LCTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FATRX
Frost Total Return Bond Fund Investor Class
0.56%5.53%6.17%8.41%-5.45%3.10%3.24%5.10%1.23%4.18%
LCTRX
Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares
1.69%4.72%6.03%8.26%2.22%1.99%12.07%1.15%6.01%4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FATRX and LCTRX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2010

0.19

Over the past year, FATRX and LCTRX have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FATRX vs. LCTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FATRX
FATRX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FATRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FATRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FATRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FATRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FATRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

LCTRX
LCTRX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LCTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FATRX vs. LCTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Total Return Bond Fund Investor Class (FATRX) and Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FATRXLCTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.67

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

3.74

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.26

14.70

-10.44

FATRX vs. LCTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FATRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the LCTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FATRX and LCTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FATRX vs. LCTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FATRX drawdown since its inception was -11.61%, smaller than the maximum LCTRX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FATRX and LCTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FATRXLCTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-26.09%

+14.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.15%

-1.17%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.59%

-1.33%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.72%

-3.82%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.61%

-23.93%

+12.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.55%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-4.08%

+3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

0.30%

+0.49%

Volatility

FATRX vs. LCTRX - Volatility Comparison

Frost Total Return Bond Fund Investor Class (FATRX) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) at 0.50%. This indicates that FATRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FATRXLCTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.50%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

1.49%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

1.98%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

2.24%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.23%

6.28%

-3.05%

FATRX vs. LCTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FATRX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than LCTRX's 2.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

FATRX vs. LCTRX - Dividend Comparison

FATRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, more than LCTRX's 5.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FATRX
Frost Total Return Bond Fund Investor Class
5.60%5.31%4.98%5.31%4.43%3.06%3.58%3.53%3.38%3.44%3.79%3.89%
LCTRX
Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares
5.32%5.53%5.57%5.31%2.18%1.69%1.17%2.40%3.31%2.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FATRX and LCTRX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FATRX has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to LCTRX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FATRX dropped -11.61% vs LCTRX's -26.09%.

LCTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FATRX and LCTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer