PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FATKX vs. STLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FATKX vs. STLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX) and BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund (STLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FATKX having a 7.25% return and STLDX slightly higher at 7.53%.


FATKX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.60%
YTD
7.25%
6M
7.96%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*

STLDX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.82%
YTD
7.53%
6M
8.07%
1Y
16.74%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
5.05%
10Y*
8.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FATKX vs. STLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FATKX
Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6
7.25%15.14%11.68%13.16%-15.93%9.13%13.79%18.14%-5.20%6.72%
STLDX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund
7.53%13.59%3.65%15.65%-15.85%11.43%13.06%22.09%-5.41%8.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FATKX and STLDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.92

The correlation between FATKX and STLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FATKX vs. STLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FATKX
FATKX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FATKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FATKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FATKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FATKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FATKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

STLDX
STLDX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
STLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
STLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
STLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
STLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FATKX vs. STLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX) and BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund (STLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FATKXSTLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.39

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.00

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.19

13.00

+1.19

FATKX vs. STLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FATKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the STLDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FATKX and STLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FATKXSTLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.12

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.45

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.51

+0.32

Drawdowns

FATKX vs. STLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FATKX drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, smaller than the maximum STLDX drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FATKX and STLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FATKXSTLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-48.43%

+25.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.48%

-5.60%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.64%

-14.58%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.44%

-22.56%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-8.23%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.29%

-0.04%

Volatility

FATKX vs. STLDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund (STLDX) at 2.47%. This indicates that FATKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FATKXSTLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

2.47%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.79%

6.35%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.96%

7.94%

-0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.01%

11.22%

-2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.28%

11.30%

-2.02%

FATKX vs. STLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FATKX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than STLDX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FATKX vs. STLDX - Dividend Comparison

FATKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.90%, more than STLDX's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FATKX
Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6
7.90%7.70%8.73%2.94%10.06%12.30%6.93%6.79%7.43%3.18%0.00%0.00%
STLDX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund
3.80%4.09%0.96%3.16%2.04%16.80%3.86%6.33%13.50%12.92%2.00%9.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FATKX and STLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FATKX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to STLDX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FATKX dropped -22.44% vs STLDX's -48.43%.

FATKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FATKX and STLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer