PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FATKX vs. STLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FATKX vs. STLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX) and BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund (STLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FATKX achieves a 6.10% return, which is significantly lower than STLDX's 6.45% return.


FATKX

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.76%
6M
3.85%
YTD
6.10%
1Y
12.89%
3Y*
12.35%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.45%

STLDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.01%
6M
4.10%
YTD
6.45%
1Y
13.07%
3Y*
9.31%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
7.67%
ALL TIME*
7.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FATKX vs. STLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FATKX
Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6
6.10%15.14%11.68%13.16%-15.93%9.13%13.79%18.14%-5.20%6.72%
STLDX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund
6.45%13.59%3.65%15.65%-15.85%11.43%13.06%22.09%-5.41%7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FATKX and STLDX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.92

The correlation between FATKX and STLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FATKX vs. STLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FATKX
FATKX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FATKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FATKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FATKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FATKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FATKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

STLDX
STLDX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
STLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
STLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
STLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
STLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FATKX vs. STLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX) and BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund (STLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FATKXSTLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

2.33

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.53

9.45

+0.08

FATKX vs. STLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FATKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the STLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FATKX and STLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FATKX vs. STLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FATKX drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, smaller than the maximum STLDX drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FATKX and STLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FATKXSTLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-48.43%

+25.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.48%

-5.60%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.30%

-14.58%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.44%

-22.56%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-1.00%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.32%

-8.20%

+3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

1.38%

-0.04%

Volatility

FATKX vs. STLDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6 (FATKX) is 2.31%, while BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund (STLDX) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that FATKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FATKXSTLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

2.63%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.76%

7.32%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.80%

8.72%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.14%

11.30%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.29%

11.27%

-1.98%

FATKX vs. STLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FATKX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than STLDX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FATKX vs. STLDX - Dividend Comparison

FATKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.99%, more than STLDX's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FATKX
Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund Class K6
7.99%7.70%8.73%2.94%10.06%12.30%6.93%6.79%7.43%3.18%0.00%0.00%
STLDX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2030 Fund
4.08%4.09%0.96%3.16%2.04%16.80%3.86%6.33%13.50%12.92%2.00%9.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FATKX and STLDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

STLDX has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to FATKX (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FATKX dropped -22.44% vs STLDX's -48.43%.

FATKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FATKX and STLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer