FASPX vs. TCVIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) and Touchstone Mid Cap Value Fund (TCVIX).
FASPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 20, 1986. TCVIX is managed by Touchstone. It was launched on Sep 30, 2009.
Performance
FASPX vs. TCVIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FASPX vs. TCVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M | 3.31% | 7.76% | -2.60% | 19.93% | -7.82% | 32.65% | 7.70% | 33.85% | -17.27% | 17.34% |
TCVIX Touchstone Mid Cap Value Fund | 5.28% | 10.00% | 8.61% | 7.78% | -8.38% | 27.12% | 5.70% | 29.76% | -16.77% | 14.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FASPX achieves a 3.31% return, which is significantly lower than TCVIX's 5.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FASPX having a 9.33% annualized return and TCVIX not far behind at 8.94%.
FASPX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
TCVIX
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- YTD
- 5.28%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 17.19%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FASPX vs. TCVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FASPX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than TCVIX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FASPX vs. TCVIX — Risk / Return Rank
FASPX
TCVIX
FASPX vs. TCVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) and Touchstone Mid Cap Value Fund (TCVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FASPX | TCVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.03 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 1.51 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.21 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.06 | 5.51 | -0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FASPX | TCVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.03 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.40 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.47 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.58 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FASPX and TCVIX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FASPX vs. TCVIX - Dividend Comparison
FASPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, more than TCVIX's 4.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M | 9.02% | 9.32% | 0.00% | 2.40% | 1.93% | 7.80% | 0.55% | 4.98% | 15.67% | 7.26% | 21.61% | 0.80% |
TCVIX Touchstone Mid Cap Value Fund | 4.03% | 4.25% | 5.48% | 1.80% | 6.59% | 6.77% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 5.86% | 6.47% | 4.44% | 7.26% |
Drawdowns
FASPX vs. TCVIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FASPX drawdown since its inception was -70.11%, which is greater than TCVIX's maximum drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASPX and TCVIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FASPX | TCVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.11% | -41.89% | -28.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -12.52% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.53% | -19.37% | -15.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.02% | -41.89% | -6.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.84% | -7.76% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -5.43% | -4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 3.00% | +0.76% |
Volatility
FASPX vs. TCVIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) and Touchstone Mid Cap Value Fund (TCVIX) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FASPX | TCVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 5.27% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 10.00% | +2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.49% | 17.54% | +4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 17.11% | +3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 19.11% | +2.85% |