FASE.L vs. EQGB.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

FASE.L (Invesco Markets II PLC - Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF) and EQGB.L (Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - FASE.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Invesco Markets II PLC - Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF, while EQGB.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FASE.L returned 8.64%/yr vs 14.06%/yr for EQGB.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FASE.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQGB.L.

Performance

FASE.L vs. EQGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Markets II PLC - Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF (FASE.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASE.L achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly lower than EQGB.L's 15.19% return.

FASE.L

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 2.11%
• 6M: 3.40%
• YTD: 5.03%
• 1Y: 15.43%
• 3Y*: 12.81%
• 5Y*: 8.64%
• 10Y*: —

EQGB.L

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -3.43%
• 6M: 15.41%
• YTD: 15.19%
• 1Y: 27.37%
• 3Y*: 23.21%
• 5Y*: 14.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASE.L vs. EQGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FASE.L Invesco Markets II PLC - Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF	5.03%	20.17%	9.31%	4.95%	-2.71%	15.34%
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc	15.19%	19.59%	26.12%	53.92%	-35.07%	28.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FASE.L and EQGB.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021	0.41

Return for Risk

FASE.L vs. EQGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASE.L

FASE.L Risk / Return Rank: 39
FASE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FASE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FASE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FASE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FASE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 36

EQGB.L

EQGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
EQGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EQGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
EQGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
EQGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASE.L vs. EQGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Markets II PLC - Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF (FASE.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FASE.L	EQGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.57	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.27	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.28	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	2.41	-0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.40	8.06	-3.66

FASE.L vs. EQGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASE.L and EQGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FASE.L vs. EQGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASE.L drawdown since its inception was -12.61%, smaller than the maximum EQGB.L drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASE.L and EQGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FASE.L	EQGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.61%	-36.77%	+24.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-11.33%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.20%	-22.76%	+10.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.61%	-36.77%	+24.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.70%	-3.88%	+2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.94%	-7.40%	+4.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	3.39%	+0.11%

Volatility

FASE.L vs. EQGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Markets II PLC - Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF (FASE.L) is 3.84%, while Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that FASE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FASE.L	EQGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	5.88%	-2.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	13.78%	-3.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	17.33%	-5.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.07%	21.20%	-8.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.95%	21.26%	-8.31%

FASE.L vs. EQGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EQGB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FASE.L vs. EQGB.L - Dividend Comparison

FASE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while EQGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.16%
FASE.L Invesco Markets II PLC - Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF	2.71%	2.61%	3.72%	3.54%	3.47%	2.35%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FASE.L and EQGB.L in my portfolio?

FASE.L and EQGB.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FASE.L or EQGB.L?

On fees, FASE.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FASE.L or EQGB.L?

FASE.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQGB.L.

What is the main difference between FASE.L and EQGB.L?

FASE.L is categorized as Global Equities, while EQGB.L is Nasdaq-100. FASE.L tracks Invesco Markets II PLC - Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF, while EQGB.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FASE.L and 0.35% for EQGB.L.