FAS vs. UXI
FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) and UXI (ProShares Ultra Industrials) are both Leveraged Equities funds - FAS tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%) while UXI tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAS returned 21.20%/yr vs 19.65%/yr for UXI. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UXI.
Performance
FAS vs. UXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than UXI's 23.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS has outperformed UXI with an annualized return of 21.20%, while UXI has yielded a comparatively lower 19.65% annualized return.
FAS
- 1D
- 4.15%
- 1M
- 10.95%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -13.89%
- 1Y
- 7.93%
- 3Y*
- 38.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 21.20%
UXI
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 23.82%
- 6M
- 21.89%
- 1Y
- 44.03%
- 3Y*
- 33.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- 19.65%
FAS vs. UXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | -13.50% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
UXI ProShares Ultra Industrials | 23.82% | 28.84% | 26.48% | 27.34% | -32.90% | 34.64% | 16.37% | 67.44% | -28.13% | 51.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAS and UXI is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008 | 0.77 |
The correlation between FAS and UXI shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FAS vs. UXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FAS
UXI
Financial Services
-
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FAS
UXI
-
Technology
FAS
UXI
Industrials
FAS
UXI
Basic Materials
FAS
-
UXI
-
Communication Services
FAS
-
UXI
-
Consumer Cyclical
FAS
-
UXI
Consumer Defensive
FAS
-
UXI
-
Energy
FAS
-
UXI
-
Healthcare
FAS
-
UXI
-
Real Estate
FAS
-
UXI
-
Utilities
FAS
-
UXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAS vs. UXI — Risk / Return Rank
FAS
UXI
FAS vs. UXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and ProShares Ultra Industrials (UXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAS | UXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.22 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 1.76 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.08 | 6.23 | -6.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAS vs. UXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, roughly equal to the maximum UXI drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and UXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAS | UXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.61% | -89.01% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.88% | -23.59% | -17.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.10% | -36.42% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.88% | -48.25% | -18.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.99% | -66.48% | -19.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.63% | -5.56% | -15.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.12% | -22.58% | -8.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.97% | 6.67% | +11.30% |
Volatility
FAS vs. UXI - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and ProShares Ultra Industrials (UXI) have volatilities of 12.45% and 12.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAS | UXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.45% | 12.20% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.46% | 27.14% | +6.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.61% | 32.32% | +11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.59% | 36.13% | +19.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.33% | 39.52% | +21.81% |
FAS vs. UXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than UXI's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAS vs. UXI - Dividend Comparison
FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, more than UXI's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | 9.64% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UXI ProShares Ultra Industrials | 0.66% | 0.90% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.03% | 0.29% | 0.58% | 0.37% | 0.24% | 0.38% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAS and UXI have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAS has higher volatility (12.45%) compared to UXI (12.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs UXI's -89.01%.
On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 21.20% vs 19.65% for UXI. On fees, UXI is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UXI has been the lower-risk option at 12.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 21.20% return vs 19.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UXI is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.64%, compared with 0.66% for UXI.
FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while UXI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 0.95% for UXI.
UXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAS and UXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer