PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAS vs. UXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAS vs. UXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and ProShares Ultra Industrials (UXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than UXI's 23.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS has outperformed UXI with an annualized return of 21.20%, while UXI has yielded a comparatively lower 19.65% annualized return.


FAS

1D
4.15%
1M
10.95%
YTD
-13.50%
6M
-13.89%
1Y
7.93%
3Y*
38.21%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
21.20%

UXI

1D
0.84%
1M
1.14%
YTD
23.82%
6M
21.89%
1Y
44.03%
3Y*
33.12%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
19.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAS vs. UXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
-13.50%21.48%84.47%14.92%-43.19%116.59%-34.97%113.04%-33.84%67.37%
UXI
ProShares Ultra Industrials
23.82%28.84%26.48%27.34%-32.90%34.64%16.37%67.44%-28.13%51.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FAS and UXI is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008

0.77

The correlation between FAS and UXI shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FAS vs. UXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAS
UXI

Financial Services

98.0%

-

Technology

1.7%
2.4%

Industrials

0.2%
56.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.0%

Financial Services

FAS
98.0%
UXI

-

Technology

FAS
1.7%
UXI
2.4%

Industrials

FAS
0.2%
UXI
56.8%

Basic Materials

FAS

-

UXI

-

Communication Services

FAS

-

UXI

-

Consumer Cyclical

FAS

-

UXI
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

FAS

-

UXI

-

Energy

FAS

-

UXI

-

Healthcare

FAS

-

UXI

-

Real Estate

FAS

-

UXI

-

Utilities

FAS

-

UXI
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAS vs. UXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAS
FAS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

UXI
UXI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
UXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
UXI Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
UXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
UXI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAS vs. UXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and ProShares Ultra Industrials (UXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FASUXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.22

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

1.76

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.08

6.23

-6.15

FAS vs. UXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAS Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the UXI Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAS and UXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAS vs. UXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, roughly equal to the maximum UXI drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and UXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASUXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.61%

-89.01%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.88%

-23.59%

-17.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.10%

-36.42%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.88%

-48.25%

-18.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.99%

-66.48%

-19.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.63%

-5.56%

-15.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.12%

-22.58%

-8.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.97%

6.67%

+11.30%

Volatility

FAS vs. UXI - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and ProShares Ultra Industrials (UXI) have volatilities of 12.45% and 12.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASUXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.45%

12.20%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.46%

27.14%

+6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.61%

32.32%

+11.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.59%

36.13%

+19.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.33%

39.52%

+21.81%

FAS vs. UXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than UXI's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAS vs. UXI - Dividend Comparison

FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, more than UXI's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
9.64%8.21%0.76%1.77%0.91%0.60%0.47%0.62%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.00%
UXI
ProShares Ultra Industrials
0.66%0.90%0.18%0.21%0.24%0.03%0.29%0.58%0.37%0.24%0.38%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAS and UXI have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAS has higher volatility (12.45%) compared to UXI (12.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs UXI's -89.01%.

On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 21.20% vs 19.65% for UXI. On fees, UXI is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UXI has been the lower-risk option at 12.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 21.20% return vs 19.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UXI is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.64%, compared with 0.66% for UXI.

FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while UXI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 0.95% for UXI.

UXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAS and UXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer