PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAS vs. SOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAS vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 98.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 21.20%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.55% annualized return.


FAS

1D
4.15%
1M
10.95%
YTD
-13.50%
6M
-13.89%
1Y
7.93%
3Y*
38.21%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
21.20%

SOXX

1D
1.59%
1M
12.49%
YTD
98.11%
6M
99.51%
1Y
171.57%
3Y*
53.00%
5Y*
33.69%
10Y*
35.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAS vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
-13.50%21.48%84.47%14.92%-43.19%116.59%-34.97%113.04%-33.84%67.37%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
98.11%40.74%12.92%67.12%-35.09%44.09%52.72%62.42%-6.49%39.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FAS and SOXX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between FAS and SOXX has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FAS vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAS
SOXX

Financial Services

98.0%

-

Technology

1.8%
100.0%

Industrials

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

FAS
98.0%
SOXX

-

Technology

FAS
1.8%
SOXX
100.0%

Industrials

FAS
0.2%
SOXX

-

Basic Materials

FAS

-

SOXX

-

Communication Services

FAS

-

SOXX

-

Consumer Cyclical

FAS

-

SOXX

-

Consumer Defensive

FAS

-

SOXX

-

Energy

FAS

-

SOXX

-

Healthcare

FAS

-

SOXX

-

Real Estate

FAS

-

SOXX

-

Utilities

FAS

-

SOXX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAS vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAS
FAS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXX
SOXX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAS vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FASSOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.62

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

10.50

-10.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.08

38.20

-38.13

FAS vs. SOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAS Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the SOXX Sharpe Ratio of 4.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAS and SOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAS vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, which is greater than SOXX's maximum drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and SOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASSOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.61%

-70.21%

-21.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.88%

-15.77%

-25.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.10%

-41.36%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.88%

-45.75%

-21.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.99%

-45.75%

-40.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.63%

-3.16%

-17.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.12%

-19.95%

-11.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.97%

4.33%

+13.64%

Volatility

FAS vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) is 12.45%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 19.42%. This indicates that FAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASSOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.45%

19.42%

-6.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.46%

31.46%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.61%

37.35%

+6.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.59%

36.73%

+18.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.33%

33.77%

+27.56%

FAS vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAS vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison

FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, more than SOXX's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
9.64%8.21%0.76%1.77%0.91%0.60%0.47%0.62%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.00%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
0.28%0.57%0.67%0.78%1.26%0.64%0.81%1.23%1.37%0.90%1.08%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAS and SOXX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXX has higher volatility (19.42%) compared to FAS (12.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs SOXX's -70.21%.

On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.55% vs 21.20% for FAS. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.55% return vs 21.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.64%, compared with 0.28% for SOXX.

FAS is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 0.34% for SOXX.

SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.43 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAS and SOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer