PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAS vs. NTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAS vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FAS

1D
0.24%
1M
-3.63%
YTD
-21.74%
6M
-12.79%
1Y
-8.69%
3Y*
35.72%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
18.78%

NTSD

1D
0.35%
1M
6.98%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAS vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FAS and NTSD is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAS vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAS
FAS Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAS vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FASNTSDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.47

FAS vs. NTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FASNTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

5.75

-5.56

Drawdowns

FAS vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and NTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASNTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.61%

-5.20%

-86.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.19%

0.00%

-28.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.11%

-0.84%

-30.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.40%

Volatility

FAS vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASNTSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.62%

24.31%

+18.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.46%

24.31%

+31.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.30%

24.31%

+36.99%

FAS vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAS vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.66%, while NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
10.66%8.21%0.76%1.77%0.91%0.60%0.47%0.62%1.43%0.11%
NTSD
WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAS and NTSD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 10.66%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 0.35% for NTSD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAS and NTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer