PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAS vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAS vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -24.46% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS has outperformed DBO with an annualized return of 18.36%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.37% annualized return.


FAS

1D
-3.47%
1M
-5.15%
YTD
-24.46%
6M
-18.86%
1Y
-12.36%
3Y*
34.13%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
18.36%

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAS vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
-24.46%21.48%84.47%14.92%-43.19%116.59%-34.97%113.04%-33.84%67.37%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FAS and DBO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2008

0.29

The correlation between FAS and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FAS vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAS
DBO

Financial Services

98.0%
116.0%

Technology

1.7%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

FAS
98.0%
DBO
116.0%

Technology

FAS
1.7%
DBO

-

Industrials

FAS
0.2%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

FAS

-

DBO

-

Communication Services

FAS

-

DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

FAS

-

DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

FAS

-

DBO

-

Energy

FAS

-

DBO

-

Healthcare

FAS

-

DBO

-

Real Estate

FAS

-

DBO

-

Utilities

FAS

-

DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAS vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAS
FAS Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAS vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FASDBODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.29

2.34

-2.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.13

2.94

-3.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.38

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

4.44

-4.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.71

9.02

-9.73

FAS vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAS Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAS and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FASDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

2.34

-2.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.50

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.36

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.02

+0.17

Drawdowns

FAS vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, roughly equal to the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.61%

-90.18%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.88%

-18.19%

-22.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.10%

-28.20%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.88%

-37.68%

-29.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.99%

-61.69%

-24.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.69%

-51.38%

+20.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.11%

-62.25%

+31.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.51%

8.92%

+8.59%

Volatility

FAS vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) is 9.50%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that FAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.50%

12.61%

-3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.51%

28.20%

+4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.76%

34.46%

+8.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.49%

32.29%

+23.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.29%

31.78%

+29.51%

FAS vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAS vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
11.04%8.21%0.76%1.77%0.91%0.60%0.47%0.62%1.43%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAS and DBO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to FAS (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 18.36% vs 11.37% for DBO. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 9.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 18.36% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 11.04%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.

FAS is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAS and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer