FAS vs. CMGG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) and CMGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FAS is passively managed, while CMGG is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CMGG.

Performance

FAS vs. CMGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -10.50% return, which is significantly higher than CMGG's -37.52% return.

FAS

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 11.10%
• YTD: -10.50%
• 6M: -13.84%
• 1Y: 5.47%
• 3Y*: 41.93%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: 22.50%

CMGG

• 1D: 2.82%
• 1M: -12.95%
• YTD: -37.52%
• 6M: -40.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAS vs. CMGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares	-10.50%	13.14%
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF	-37.52%	36.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FAS and CMGG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.53

Return for Risk

FAS vs. CMGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAS

FAS Risk / Return Rank: 11
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CMGG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAS vs. CMGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAS	CMGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.30	—	—

Drawdowns

FAS vs. CMGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, which is greater than CMGG's maximum drawdown of -56.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and CMGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAS	CMGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.61%	-56.75%	-34.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.88%	-48.19%	+30.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.10%	-23.37%	-7.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.17%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FAS	CMGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.44%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.36%	68.93%	-25.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.35%	68.93%	-13.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.18%	68.93%	-7.75%

FAS vs. CMGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CMGG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAS vs. CMGG - Dividend Comparison

FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, while CMGG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares	9.32%	8.21%	0.76%	1.77%	0.91%	0.60%	0.47%	0.62%	1.43%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAS and CMGG in my portfolio?

FAS and CMGG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FAS or CMGG?

On fees, CMGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAS or CMGG?

CMGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAS or CMGG?

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 0.00% for CMGG.

What is the main difference between FAS and CMGG?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 0.75% for CMGG.