FARX vs. ACLO
FARX (Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FARX is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Frontier, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FARX returned 20.01% vs 5.31% for ACLO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FARX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.
Performance
FARX vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FARX achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly higher than ACLO's 2.21% return.
FARX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 20.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FARX vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FARX Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF | 9.60% | 10.61% | 0.35% |
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 2.21% | 5.32% | 0.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between FARX and ACLO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FARX vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank
FARX
ACLO
FARX vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FARX | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -10.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 3.41 | -1.83 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.19 | 19.90 | -12.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.70 | 164.37 | -139.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FARX | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 7.29 | -4.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.12 | 5.10 | -2.98 |
Drawdowns
FARX vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FARX drawdown since its inception was -5.83%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FARX and ACLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FARX | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -1.01% | -4.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -0.27% | -2.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | 0.00% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.02% | -0.05% | -0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 0.03% | +0.78% |
Volatility
FARX vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.14%. This indicates that FARX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FARX | ACLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 0.14% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.49% | 0.57% | +4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.96% | 0.73% | +6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.94% | 1.08% | +5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.94% | 1.08% | +5.86% |
FARX vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FARX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FARX vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison
FARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than ACLO's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 4.91% | 4.87% | 0.59% |
FARX Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF | 2.89% | 3.25% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FARX and ACLO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FARX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to ACLO (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FARX dropped -5.83% vs ACLO's -1.01%.
On 1-year performance, FARX leads with 20.01% vs 5.31% for ACLO. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FARX has performed better with a 20.01% return vs 5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FARX.
ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 2.89% for FARX.
FARX is categorized as Multistrategy, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Frontier and TCW. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FARX and 0.20% for ACLO.
ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.29 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FARX and ACLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer