FARMX vs. CSUIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FARMX (Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund) and CSUIX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FARMX returned 3.99%/yr vs 7.11%/yr for CSUIX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FARMX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for CSUIX.

Performance

FARMX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund (FARMX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FARMX achieves a 19.17% return, which is significantly higher than CSUIX's 9.60% return.

FARMX

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: -2.00%
• YTD: 19.17%
• 6M: 18.47%
• 1Y: 15.19%
• 3Y*: 6.84%
• 5Y*: 3.99%
• 10Y*: —

CSUIX

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: -2.21%
• YTD: 9.60%
• 6M: 8.98%
• 1Y: 16.57%
• 3Y*: 12.14%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: 7.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FARMX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FARMX Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund	19.17%	7.99%	-4.83%	-11.61%	13.68%	23.36%	53.58%
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.	9.60%	14.69%	8.74%	2.46%	-4.89%	16.60%	14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FARMX and CSUIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2020	0.56

The correlation between FARMX and CSUIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FARMX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FARMX

FARMX Risk / Return Rank: 13
FARMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
FARMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
FARMX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
FARMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FARMX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CSUIX

CSUIX Risk / Return Rank: 42
CSUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
CSUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CSUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CSUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CSUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FARMX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund (FARMX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FARMX	CSUIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	1.74	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	2.52	-1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.31	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	2.83	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.09	9.50	-6.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FARMX vs. CSUIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FARMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the CSUIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FARMX and CSUIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FARMX	CSUIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	1.74	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.55	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.57	+0.18

Drawdowns

FARMX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FARMX drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FARMX and CSUIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FARMX	CSUIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.27%	-52.01%	+21.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.89%	-5.96%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.81%	-14.89%	-4.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.27%	-20.01%	-10.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.35%	-3.34%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.84%	-8.16%	-4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	1.77%	+3.16%

Volatility

FARMX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund (FARMX) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.11%. This indicates that FARMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FARMX	CSUIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	3.11%	+1.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.15%	7.81%	+4.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.70%	9.68%	+6.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.95%	12.97%	+5.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.71%	14.90%	+4.81%

FARMX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FARMX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

FARMX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison

FARMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than CSUIX's 7.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc.	7.67%	8.41%	2.58%	2.53%	3.91%	3.25%	1.64%	1.83%	2.45%	5.12%	2.35%	6.52%
FARMX Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund	1.55%	1.85%	2.29%	1.33%	1.17%	0.71%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FARMX and CSUIX in my portfolio?

FARMX and CSUIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FARMX or CSUIX?

FARMX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to CSUIX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FARMX dropped -30.27% vs CSUIX's -52.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.