FARCX vs. NHMFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FARCX (Nuveen Real Estate Securities Fund) and NHMFX (Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6) are both mutual funds - FARCX is a REIT fund managed by Nuveen, while NHMFX is a High Yield Muni fund managed by Nuveen. Over the past 5 years, FARCX returned 3.81%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for NHMFX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FARCX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for NHMFX.

Performance

FARCX vs. NHMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Real Estate Securities Fund (FARCX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6 (NHMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FARCX achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly higher than NHMFX's 3.13% return.

FARCX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -1.72%
• YTD: 11.57%
• 6M: 11.04%
• 1Y: 14.09%
• 3Y*: 9.90%
• 5Y*: 3.81%
• 10Y*: 5.60%

NHMFX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 3.13%
• 6M: 3.82%
• 1Y: 9.64%
• 3Y*: 4.77%
• 5Y*: 1.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FARCX vs. NHMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FARCX Nuveen Real Estate Securities Fund	11.57%	2.56%	6.04%	11.55%	-24.57%	41.57%	-6.14%	25.63%	-5.57%	5.67%
NHMFX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6	3.13%	3.21%	5.23%	6.74%	-14.90%	9.94%	3.33%	12.18%	2.05%	12.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FARCX and NHMFX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2016	0.20

The correlation between FARCX and NHMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FARCX vs. NHMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FARCX

FARCX Risk / Return Rank: 19
FARCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FARCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
FARCX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FARCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
FARCX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

NHMFX

NHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 61
NHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
NHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
NHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
NHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
NHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FARCX vs. NHMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Real Estate Securities Fund (FARCX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6 (NHMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FARCX	NHMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	2.25	-1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	3.60	-2.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.51	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	2.83	-0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.96	8.46	-2.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FARCX vs. NHMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FARCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the NHMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FARCX and NHMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FARCX	NHMFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	2.25	-1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.15	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.50	-0.09

Drawdowns

FARCX vs. NHMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FARCX drawdown since its inception was -70.62%, which is greater than NHMFX's maximum drawdown of -22.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FARCX and NHMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FARCX	NHMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.62%	-22.25%	-48.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.83%	-3.58%	-4.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.59%	-10.89%	-6.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.77%	-21.55%	-10.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.26%	-0.07%	-3.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.45%	-4.87%	-5.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	1.19%	+1.21%

Volatility

FARCX vs. NHMFX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Real Estate Securities Fund (FARCX) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6 (NHMFX) at 1.55%. This indicates that FARCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NHMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FARCX	NHMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	1.55%	+2.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.28%	3.13%	+6.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.98%	4.49%	+8.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.34%	6.87%	+11.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.15%	6.76%	+13.39%

FARCX vs. NHMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FARCX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than NHMFX's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FARCX vs. NHMFX - Dividend Comparison

FARCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, less than NHMFX's 6.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FARCX Nuveen Real Estate Securities Fund	5.22%	5.77%	9.34%	3.30%	20.25%	15.12%	2.89%	11.46%	6.19%	13.43%	10.99%	8.24%
NHMFX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6	6.14%	6.59%	5.35%	6.99%	5.68%	4.71%	5.05%	5.03%	5.46%	5.37%	2.52%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FARCX and NHMFX in my portfolio?

FARCX and NHMFX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FARCX or NHMFX?

FARCX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to NHMFX (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FARCX dropped -70.62% vs NHMFX's -22.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NHMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.