PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAPSX vs. SIFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAPSX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Risk Parity Fund (FAPSX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAPSX achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly higher than SIFAX's 8.08% return.


FAPSX

1D
0.43%
1M
2.62%
YTD
10.72%
6M
11.26%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
10Y*

SIFAX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
8.08%
6M
7.70%
1Y
12.43%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
3.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAPSX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FAPSX
Fidelity Risk Parity Fund
10.72%21.09%6.87%8.45%3.78%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
8.08%7.82%4.08%-1.74%1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FAPSX and SIFAX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between FAPSX and SIFAX has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAPSX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAPSX
FAPSX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FAPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FAPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SIFAX
SIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAPSX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Risk Parity Fund (FAPSX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAPSXSIFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.44

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

5.18

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.25

16.54

-2.29

FAPSX vs. SIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAPSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the SIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAPSX and SIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAPSXSIFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.31

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.34

+0.92

Drawdowns

FAPSX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAPSX drawdown since its inception was -10.07%, smaller than the maximum SIFAX drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPSX and SIFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAPSXSIFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-23.62%

+13.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.66%

-2.41%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.68%

-3.57%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.83%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-8.55%

+6.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

0.75%

+1.08%

Volatility

FAPSX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Risk Parity Fund (FAPSX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) at 2.18%. This indicates that FAPSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAPSXSIFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

2.18%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

4.69%

+4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.39%

5.41%

+4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.16%

5.60%

+5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.16%

5.22%

+5.94%

FAPSX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAPSX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAPSX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison

FAPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%, more than SIFAX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAPSX
Fidelity Risk Parity Fund
6.89%5.31%4.91%3.84%6.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
4.21%4.55%3.25%3.82%11.90%7.89%1.45%1.49%1.90%1.39%1.15%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAPSX and SIFAX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAPSX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to SIFAX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAPSX dropped -10.07% vs SIFAX's -23.62%.

FAPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAPSX and SIFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer