FAPR vs. GMAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FAPR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) and GMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March) are both exchange-traded funds - FAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while GMAR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest. FAPR is passively managed, while GMAR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FAPR returned 13.47%/yr vs 12.24%/yr for GMAR. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

FAPR vs. GMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAPR achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than GMAR's 7.89% return.

FAPR

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 5.18%
• 6M: 6.07%
• 1Y: 12.66%
• 3Y*: 13.47%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: —

GMAR

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 8.66%
• 1Y: 15.30%
• 3Y*: 12.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAPR vs. GMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	5.18%	7.58%	18.14%	15.34%
GMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March	7.89%	9.29%	12.14%	11.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FAPR and GMAR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2023	0.87

The correlation between FAPR and GMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

FAPR vs. GMAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FAPR	GMAR
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

FAPR vs. GMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAPR

FAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

GMAR

GMAR Risk / Return Rank: 97
GMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAPR vs. GMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAPR	GMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.37	3.94	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.48	6.60	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	2.02	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.10	8.56	+2.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	48.99	59.52	-10.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAPR vs. GMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is comparable to the GMAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAPR and GMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAPR	GMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.37	3.94	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.91	-1.05

Drawdowns

FAPR vs. GMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAPR drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, which is greater than GMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPR and GMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAPR	GMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.96%	-9.11%	-6.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.15%	-1.79%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.64%	-9.11%	-2.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-0.10%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.71%	-0.54%	-2.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.26%	0.26%	0.00%

Volatility

FAPR vs. GMAR - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) at 0.69%. This indicates that FAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAPR	GMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.43%	0.69%	+0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.83%	2.99%	-0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.79%	3.90%	-0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.49%	6.84%	+3.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.43%	6.84%	+3.59%

FAPR vs. GMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FAPR and GMAR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

FAPR vs. GMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither FAPR nor GMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAPR and GMAR in my portfolio?

FAPR and GMAR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAPR or GMAR?

FAPR has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to GMAR (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAPR dropped -15.96% vs GMAR's -9.11%.

Which ETF is better, FAPR or GMAR?

On 3-year performance, FAPR leads with 13.47% vs 12.24% for GMAR. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, GMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAPR or GMAR?

Over the 3-year period, FAPR has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 12.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAPR or GMAR?

FAPR and GMAR have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAPR or GMAR?

FAPR and GMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FAPR and GMAR?

FAPR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while GMAR is Options Trading.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 3.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.