FAPR vs. DOGG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FAPR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) and DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while DOGG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by FT Vest. FAPR is passively managed, while DOGG is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FAPR returned 12.06%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for DOGG. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FAPR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DOGG.

Performance

FAPR vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAPR achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than DOGG's 11.04% return.

FAPR

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 0.63%
• 6M: 5.27%
• YTD: 5.72%
• 1Y: 10.62%
• 3Y*: 12.06%
• 5Y*: 8.57%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.81%

DOGG

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: 4.34%
• YTD: 11.04%
• 1Y: 22.01%
• 3Y*: 11.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	$622.61K	$753.69K	$702.49K
FAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	$718.11K	$703.92K	$2.65M

FAPR vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	5.72%	7.58%	18.14%	14.10%
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	11.04%	19.43%	-2.58%	12.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FAPR and DOGG is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2023	0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between FAPR and DOGG has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FAPR vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAPR

FAPR Risk / Return Rank: 92
FAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

DOGG

DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 76
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 83
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAPR vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAPR	DOGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.00	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	2.95	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.35	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.65	2.74	+1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.42	5.80	+18.62

FAPR vs. DOGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAPR Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the DOGG Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAPR and DOGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAPR vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAPR drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, which is greater than DOGG's maximum drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPR and DOGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAPR	DOGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.96%	-11.19%	-4.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.21%	-8.29%	+6.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.64%	-11.19%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-2.39%	+2.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.65%	-3.27%	+0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.42%	3.91%	-3.49%

Volatility

FAPR vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) is 2.20%, while FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that FAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DOGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAPR	DOGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.20%	5.00%	-2.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.31%	9.40%	-5.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.82%	11.50%	-6.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.52%	13.07%	-2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.37%	13.07%	-2.70%

FAPR vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAPR vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison

FAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.63%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	8.63%	8.75%	9.92%	5.89%
FAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAPR and DOGG in my portfolio?

FAPR and DOGG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAPR or DOGG?

DOGG has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to FAPR (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAPR dropped -15.96% vs DOGG's -11.19%.

Which ETF is better, FAPR or DOGG?

On 3-year performance, FAPR leads with 12.06% vs 11.93% for DOGG. On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FAPR has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAPR or DOGG?

Over the 3-year period, FAPR has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 11.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAPR or DOGG?

DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAPR or DOGG?

DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.63%, compared with 0.00% for FAPR.

What is the main difference between FAPR and DOGG?

FAPR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DOGG is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FAPR and 0.75% for DOGG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.