FAOSX vs. CIGIX
FAOSX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z) and CIGIX (Calamos International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FAOSX returned 3.89%/yr vs 5.46%/yr for CIGIX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAOSX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CIGIX.
Performance
FAOSX vs. CIGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FAOSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
CIGIX
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 35.71%
- 6M
- 36.79%
- 1Y
- 51.70%
- 3Y*
- 24.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
FAOSX vs. CIGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 15.36% | 5.06% | 20.52% | -24.31% | 19.42% | 15.17% | 27.96% | -14.73% | 26.25% |
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund | 35.71% | 23.11% | 12.51% | 15.33% | -30.54% | -8.98% | 44.95% | 29.69% | -20.93% | 32.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAOSX and CIGIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.85 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAOSX and CIGIX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAOSX vs. CIGIX — Risk / Return Rank
FAOSX
CIGIX
FAOSX vs. CIGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) and Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAOSX | CIGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.37 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 3.21 | -3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | 11.54 | -11.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAOSX vs. CIGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAOSX drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, smaller than the maximum CIGIX drawdown of -64.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAOSX and CIGIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAOSX | CIGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.24% | -64.46% | +28.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -15.88% | +8.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.96% | -19.38% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.24% | -50.15% | +13.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.86% | 0.00% | -5.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.92% | -15.27% | +7.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | 4.40% | -0.27% |
Volatility
FAOSX vs. CIGIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) is 0.00%, while Calamos International Growth Fund (CIGIX) has a volatility of 12.19%. This indicates that FAOSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAOSX | CIGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 12.19% | -12.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.63% | 22.20% | -18.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.76% | 25.03% | -16.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 21.58% | -4.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 20.23% | -3.59% |
FAOSX vs. CIGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAOSX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than CIGIX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAOSX vs. CIGIX - Dividend Comparison
FAOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, less than CIGIX's 9.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIGIX Calamos International Growth Fund | 9.94% | 13.49% | 4.54% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.33% | 5.42% | 0.00% | 13.25% | 3.76% | 0.00% | 0.13% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 8.67% | 8.67% | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 5.30% | 3.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAOSX and CIGIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIGIX has higher volatility (12.19%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAOSX dropped -36.24% vs CIGIX's -64.46%.
CIGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAOSX and CIGIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer