PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAOOX vs. GFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAOOX vs. GFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Investment Company of America Class 529-F-3 (FAOOX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FAOOX having a 9.78% return and GFFFX slightly lower at 9.40%.


FAOOX

1D
1.32%
1M
0.88%
YTD
9.78%
6M
9.75%
1Y
24.97%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*

GFFFX

1D
1.79%
1M
2.51%
YTD
9.40%
6M
8.77%
1Y
24.88%
3Y*
23.89%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
16.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAOOX vs. GFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FAOOX
American Funds Investment Company of America Class 529-F-3
9.78%20.77%25.21%28.87%-15.29%25.39%3.86%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2
9.40%19.96%28.28%37.51%-30.61%19.55%8.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FAOOX and GFFFX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2020

0.93

The correlation between FAOOX and GFFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAOOX vs. GFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAOOX
FAOOX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FAOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

GFFFX
GFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAOOX vs. GFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Investment Company of America Class 529-F-3 (FAOOX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAOOXGFFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

1.79

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.86

6.84

+4.02

FAOOX vs. GFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAOOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the GFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAOOX and GFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAOOX vs. GFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAOOX drawdown since its inception was -24.17%, smaller than the maximum GFFFX drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAOOX and GFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAOOXGFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.17%

-36.26%

+12.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-13.74%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-21.55%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.17%

-36.26%

+12.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-1.03%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-5.56%

+1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

3.58%

-1.32%

Volatility

FAOOX vs. GFFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Investment Company of America Class 529-F-3 (FAOOX) is 5.04%, while American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that FAOOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAOOXGFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

6.90%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

13.13%

-2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

16.28%

-3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

20.43%

-4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.83%

19.77%

-3.94%

FAOOX vs. GFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAOOX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than GFFFX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAOOX vs. GFFFX - Dividend Comparison

FAOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.37%, less than GFFFX's 10.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAOOX
American Funds Investment Company of America Class 529-F-3
9.37%10.84%9.53%5.20%6.39%7.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2
10.01%10.95%9.23%7.64%4.32%8.42%4.51%7.38%12.29%7.27%6.87%9.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FAOOX and GFFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GFFFX has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to FAOOX (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAOOX dropped -24.17% vs GFFFX's -36.26%.

FAOOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAOOX and GFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer