FAOFX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
FAOFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
FAOFX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAOFX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOFX Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund | -8.82% | 22.32% | 39.90% | 46.96% | -37.34% | 13.29% | 68.46% | 40.79% | 16.47% | 35.62% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAOFX achieves a -8.82% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FAOFX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 20.25%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.14% annualized return.
FAOFX
- 1D
- 4.64%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- YTD
- -8.82%
- 6M
- -7.85%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- 25.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 20.25%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAOFX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAOFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FAOFX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FAOFX
VOO
FAOFX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAOFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.01 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.53 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.55 | +0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 7.31 | -1.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAOFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.01 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.71 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.79 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.83 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAOFX and VOO is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAOFX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FAOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.99%, more than VOO's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOFX Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund | 16.99% | 15.49% | 8.75% | 0.33% | 0.54% | 30.66% | 32.61% | 28.66% | 24.08% | 10.40% | 4.35% | 11.85% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
FAOFX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAOFX drawdown since its inception was -43.59%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAOFX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAOFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.59% | -33.99% | -9.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.48% | -11.98% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.59% | -24.52% | -19.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.59% | -33.99% | -9.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.56% | -5.55% | -6.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.19% | -3.72% | -4.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 2.55% | +1.83% |
Volatility
FAOFX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) has a higher volatility of 8.34% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that FAOFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAOFX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.34% | 5.34% | +3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.74% | 9.47% | +5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.75% | 18.11% | +6.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 16.82% | +8.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.83% | 17.99% | +5.84% |