FAOFX vs. BPTRX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FAOFX (Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund) and BPTRX (Baron Partners Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FAOFX returned 23.63%/yr vs 25.50%/yr for BPTRX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAOFX charges 0.00%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for BPTRX.

Performance

FAOFX vs. BPTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAOFX achieves a 18.67% return, which is significantly higher than BPTRX's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FAOFX has underperformed BPTRX with an annualized return of 23.63%, while BPTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.50% annualized return.

FAOFX

• 1D: 2.11%
• 1M: 5.25%
• YTD: 18.67%
• 6M: 18.26%
• 1Y: 39.91%
• 3Y*: 31.91%
• 5Y*: 13.95%
• 10Y*: 23.63%

BPTRX

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: 14.33%
• YTD: 12.47%
• 6M: 8.60%
• 1Y: 52.92%
• 3Y*: 24.00%
• 5Y*: 14.99%
• 10Y*: 25.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAOFX vs. BPTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAOFX Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund	18.67%	22.32%	39.90%	46.96%	-37.34%	13.29%	68.46%	40.79%	16.47%	35.62%
BPTRX Baron Partners Fund	12.47%	24.54%	32.75%	43.09%	-42.53%	31.35%	148.81%	44.99%	-2.01%	31.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FAOFX and BPTRX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2013	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between FAOFX and BPTRX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FAOFX vs. BPTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAOFX

FAOFX Risk / Return Rank: 50
FAOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FAOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FAOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FAOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FAOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

BPTRX

BPTRX Risk / Return Rank: 72
BPTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
BPTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BPTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
BPTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
BPTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAOFX vs. BPTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAOFX	BPTRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.83	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	3.76	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.43	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	4.93	-2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.43	12.04	-2.61

FAOFX vs. BPTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAOFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the BPTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAOFX and BPTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAOFX vs. BPTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAOFX drawdown since its inception was -43.59%, smaller than the maximum BPTRX drawdown of -64.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAOFX and BPTRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAOFX	BPTRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.59%	-64.11%	+20.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.48%	-10.71%	-4.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.60%	-33.34%	+6.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.59%	-49.87%	+6.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.59%	-51.26%	+7.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-4.52%	+4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.08%	-13.77%	+5.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.21%	4.38%	-0.17%

Volatility

FAOFX vs. BPTRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund (FAOFX) is 8.31%, while Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) has a volatility of 11.09%. This indicates that FAOFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAOFX	BPTRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.31%	11.09%	-2.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.77%	16.00%	-0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.64%	28.94%	-9.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.23%	33.94%	-8.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.01%	32.86%	-8.85%

FAOFX vs. BPTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAOFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BPTRX's 1.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAOFX vs. BPTRX - Dividend Comparison

FAOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.05%, more than BPTRX's 2.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BPTRX Baron Partners Fund	2.99%	3.36%	0.76%	0.00%	3.19%	7.72%	3.67%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.35%
FAOFX Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opportunities Fund	13.05%	15.49%	8.75%	0.33%	0.54%	30.66%	32.61%	28.66%	24.08%	10.40%	4.35%	11.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAOFX and BPTRX in my portfolio?

FAOFX and BPTRX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAOFX or BPTRX?

BPTRX has higher volatility (11.09%) compared to FAOFX (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAOFX dropped -43.59% vs BPTRX's -64.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAOFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.