FAMVX vs. RMBMX
FAMVX (FAM Value Fund) and RMBMX (RMB SMID Cap Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FAMVX returned 10.52%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for RMBMX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FAMVX charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for RMBMX.
Performance
FAMVX vs. RMBMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAMVX achieves a 8.68% return, which is significantly lower than RMBMX's 11.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FAMVX having a 10.52% annualized return and RMBMX not far ahead at 11.00%.
FAMVX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 8.68%
- 1Y
- 11.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.82%
RMBMX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.83%
- 6M
- 7.36%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 14.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.86%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RMBMX RMB SMID Cap Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FAMVX vs. RMBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | 8.68% | 4.90% | 15.51% | 16.09% | -14.06% | 25.65% | 6.81% | 30.31% | -6.15% | 17.34% |
RMBMX RMB SMID Cap Fund | 11.10% | 2.46% | 10.04% | 20.32% | -20.36% | 28.05% | 24.43% | 31.74% | -5.04% | 13.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAMVX and RMBMX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2004 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FAMVX and RMBMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAMVX vs. RMBMX — Risk / Return Rank
FAMVX
RMBMX
FAMVX vs. RMBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) and RMB SMID Cap Fund (RMBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAMVX | RMBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.16 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 1.34 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 4.78 | -1.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAMVX vs. RMBMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAMVX drawdown since its inception was -51.12%, roughly equal to the maximum RMBMX drawdown of -52.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMVX and RMBMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAMVX | RMBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.12% | -52.47% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.47% | -10.40% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.74% | -24.10% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.77% | -29.03% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.73% | -39.63% | +1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -2.48% | +1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.40% | -7.87% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 2.92% | +0.18% |
Volatility
FAMVX vs. RMBMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) is 3.48%, while RMB SMID Cap Fund (RMBMX) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that FAMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAMVX | RMBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 3.69% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 12.02% | -1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 16.21% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 20.80% | -3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 20.83% | -2.64% |
FAMVX vs. RMBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAMVX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than RMBMX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAMVX vs. RMBMX - Dividend Comparison
FAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than RMBMX's 17.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | 4.51% | 4.90% | 6.28% | 5.01% | 3.67% | 4.99% | 3.69% | 6.80% | 4.09% | 5.06% | 5.21% | 9.06% |
RMBMX RMB SMID Cap Fund | 17.76% | 19.73% | 9.50% | 10.12% | 8.40% | 5.53% | 5.34% | 14.27% | 15.63% | 14.74% | 18.84% | 6.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAMVX and RMBMX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMBMX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to FAMVX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMVX dropped -51.12% vs RMBMX's -52.47%.
RMBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAMVX and RMBMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer