PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAMVX vs. NEEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAMVX vs. NEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAMVX achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly lower than NEEGX's 34.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMVX has underperformed NEEGX with an annualized return of 10.41%, while NEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.06% annualized return.


FAMVX

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.67%
6M
6.51%
YTD
8.80%
1Y
12.03%
3Y*
11.54%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
10.41%
ALL TIME*
9.82%

NEEGX

1D
5.86%
1M
-10.02%
6M
17.12%
YTD
34.50%
1Y
51.33%
3Y*
16.90%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
14.06%
ALL TIME*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FAMVX vs. NEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAMVX
FAM Value Fund
8.80%4.90%15.51%16.09%-14.06%25.65%6.81%30.31%-6.15%17.34%
NEEGX
Needham Growth Fund
34.50%8.76%14.45%26.85%-33.57%27.63%41.73%42.33%-10.56%8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FAMVX and NEEGX is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 1995

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between FAMVX and NEEGX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAMVX vs. NEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAMVX
FAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

NEEGX
NEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAMVX vs. NEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAMVXNEEGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.24

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

2.00

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

8.32

-5.23

FAMVX vs. NEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAMVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the NEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAMVX and NEEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAMVX vs. NEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAMVX drawdown since its inception was -51.12%, roughly equal to the maximum NEEGX drawdown of -53.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMVX and NEEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAMVXNEEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.12%

-53.60%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.47%

-23.15%

+13.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.74%

-38.66%

+21.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.77%

-43.35%

+20.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.73%

-43.35%

+5.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-18.65%

+17.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.40%

-10.88%

+4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

5.68%

-2.57%

Volatility

FAMVX vs. NEEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) is 3.48%, while Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a volatility of 12.98%. This indicates that FAMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAMVXNEEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

12.98%

-9.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

26.85%

-16.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.94%

32.47%

-18.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

29.42%

-12.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

25.90%

-7.71%

FAMVX vs. NEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAMVX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEGX's 1.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAMVX vs. NEEGX - Dividend Comparison

FAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than NEEGX's 5.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAMVX
FAM Value Fund
4.51%4.90%6.28%5.01%3.67%4.99%3.69%6.80%4.09%5.06%5.21%9.06%
NEEGX
Needham Growth Fund
5.63%7.57%3.92%0.00%1.78%6.92%5.73%11.31%17.79%9.70%4.22%6.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAMVX and NEEGX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEEGX has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to FAMVX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMVX dropped -51.12% vs NEEGX's -53.60%.

NEEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAMVX and NEEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer