PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAMVX vs. BFGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAMVX vs. BFGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAMVX achieves a 4.31% return, which is significantly higher than BFGFX's 1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMVX has underperformed BFGFX with an annualized return of 10.21%, while BFGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.90% annualized return.


FAMVX

1D
0.87%
1M
1.01%
YTD
4.31%
6M
3.05%
1Y
5.08%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
10.21%

BFGFX

1D
-1.89%
1M
6.00%
YTD
1.84%
6M
12.90%
1Y
21.99%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
20.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAMVX vs. BFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAMVX
FAM Value Fund
4.31%4.90%15.51%16.09%-14.06%25.65%6.81%30.31%-6.15%17.34%
BFGFX
Baron Focused Growth Fund
1.84%21.94%29.52%27.40%-28.21%18.67%122.38%30.05%3.76%26.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FAMVX and BFGFX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2004

0.70

The correlation between FAMVX and BFGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAMVX vs. BFGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAMVX
FAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BFGFX
BFGFX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
BFGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BFGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAMVX vs. BFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) and Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAMVXBFGFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.43

1.19

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.73

2.18

-1.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.25

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

2.32

-1.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.87

6.26

-4.38

FAMVX vs. BFGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAMVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the BFGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAMVX and BFGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAMVXBFGFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

1.19

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.58

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.87

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.70

-0.12

Drawdowns

FAMVX vs. BFGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAMVX drawdown since its inception was -51.12%, smaller than the maximum BFGFX drawdown of -59.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMVX and BFGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAMVXBFGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.12%

-59.52%

+8.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.47%

-9.74%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.74%

-21.00%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.77%

-35.93%

+13.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.73%

-43.62%

+5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-1.89%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-12.37%

+5.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

3.61%

-0.47%

Volatility

FAMVX vs. BFGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) is 3.81%, while Baron Focused Growth Fund (BFGFX) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that FAMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAMVXBFGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

5.18%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

15.67%

-5.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

19.05%

-5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.15%

22.34%

-5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

23.99%

-5.78%

FAMVX vs. BFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAMVX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BFGFX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAMVX vs. BFGFX - Dividend Comparison

FAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, while BFGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFGFX
Baron Focused Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%12.28%15.53%2.85%1.78%1.07%2.11%6.02%5.80%
FAMVX
FAM Value Fund
4.70%4.90%6.28%5.01%3.67%4.99%3.69%6.80%4.09%5.06%5.21%9.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAMVX and BFGFX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BFGFX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to FAMVX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMVX dropped -51.12% vs BFGFX's -59.52%.

BFGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAMVX and BFGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer