FAMFX vs. PNSAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FAMFX (FAM Small Cap Fund) and PNSAX (Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FAMFX returned 7.30%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for PNSAX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FAMFX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for PNSAX.

Performance

FAMFX vs. PNSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAMFX achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than PNSAX's 16.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMFX has underperformed PNSAX with an annualized return of 7.30%, while PNSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.93% annualized return.

FAMFX

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: 1.53%
• 6M: 2.84%
• YTD: 2.21%
• 1Y: -3.18%
• 3Y*: 2.48%
• 5Y*: 2.79%
• 10Y*: 7.30%
• ALL TIME*: 9.24%

PNSAX

• 1D: 3.67%
• 1M: -4.68%
• 6M: 10.87%
• YTD: 16.15%
• 1Y: 22.94%
• 3Y*: 17.06%
• 5Y*: 7.81%
• 10Y*: 14.93%
• ALL TIME*: 11.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PNSAX Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FAMFX vs. PNSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund	2.21%	-11.60%	12.43%	20.10%	-12.42%	27.72%	10.10%	26.89%	-8.54%	4.56%
PNSAX Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund	16.15%	8.91%	22.98%	22.87%	-28.10%	14.38%	47.65%	37.60%	-2.46%	20.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FAMFX and PNSAX is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2012	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between FAMFX and PNSAX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FAMFX vs. PNSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAMFX

FAMFX Risk / Return Rank: 2
FAMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FAMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FAMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FAMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FAMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

PNSAX

PNSAX Risk / Return Rank: 26
PNSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
PNSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
PNSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
PNSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
PNSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAMFX vs. PNSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAMFX	PNSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	0.78	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.45	1.24	-1.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.15	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	1.41	-1.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.57	4.27	-4.84

FAMFX vs. PNSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAMFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the PNSAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAMFX and PNSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAMFX vs. PNSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAMFX drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, smaller than the maximum PNSAX drawdown of -69.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMFX and PNSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAMFX	PNSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.66%	-69.47%	+29.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.49%	-14.00%	-7.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.71%	-26.25%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.71%	-38.77%	+10.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.66%	-38.77%	-0.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.95%	-9.57%	-7.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.11%	-23.45%	+17.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.17%	4.61%	+7.56%

Volatility

FAMFX vs. PNSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) is 6.60%, while Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that FAMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAMFX	PNSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.60%	8.02%	-1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.91%	20.84%	-6.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.35%	25.20%	-6.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.91%	23.68%	-4.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.56%	23.74%	-4.18%

FAMFX vs. PNSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAMFX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than PNSAX's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAMFX vs. PNSAX - Dividend Comparison

FAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than PNSAX's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund	3.34%	3.41%	4.43%	6.44%	0.36%	6.55%	0.00%	0.47%	10.85%	2.15%	2.99%	0.24%
PNSAX Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund	0.37%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	15.27%	4.87%	1.93%	1.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAMFX and PNSAX in my portfolio?

FAMFX and PNSAX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAMFX or PNSAX?

PNSAX has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to FAMFX (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMFX dropped -39.66% vs PNSAX's -69.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PNSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.