FAMFX vs. NESGX
Compare and contrast key facts about FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX).
FAMFX is managed by FAM. It was launched on Mar 1, 2012. NESGX is managed by Needham. It was launched on May 22, 2002.
Performance
FAMFX vs. NESGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAMFX vs. NESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | -11.69% | -11.60% | 12.43% | 20.10% | -12.42% | 27.72% | 10.10% | 26.89% | -8.54% | 4.56% |
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund | 9.51% | 10.50% | 12.76% | 5.68% | -30.21% | 10.59% | 71.90% | 54.42% | -5.43% | 11.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAMFX achieves a -11.69% return, which is significantly lower than NESGX's 9.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMFX has underperformed NESGX with an annualized return of 6.33%, while NESGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.30% annualized return.
FAMFX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -9.70%
- YTD
- -11.69%
- 6M
- -15.35%
- 1Y
- -17.58%
- 3Y*
- -0.17%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- 6.33%
NESGX
- 1D
- -4.45%
- 1M
- -7.07%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 47.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- 14.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAMFX vs. NESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAMFX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than NESGX's 1.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAMFX vs. NESGX — Risk / Return Rank
FAMFX
NESGX
FAMFX vs. NESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAMFX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | 1.32 | -2.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | 1.88 | -3.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.25 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 2.38 | -3.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.02 | 8.02 | -10.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAMFX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | 1.32 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.02 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.56 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.51 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAMFX and NESGX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAMFX vs. NESGX - Dividend Comparison
FAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, while NESGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | 3.86% | 3.41% | 4.43% | 6.44% | 0.36% | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 10.85% | 2.15% | 2.99% | 0.24% |
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.16% | 25.09% | 13.69% | 8.43% | 22.26% | 8.94% | 6.67% | 2.52% |
Drawdowns
FAMFX vs. NESGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAMFX drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, smaller than the maximum NESGX drawdown of -50.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMFX and NESGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAMFX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.66% | -50.29% | +10.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.23% | -17.27% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.71% | -50.05% | +21.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.66% | -50.29% | +10.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.24% | -9.15% | -19.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -11.74% | +6.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.34% | 5.13% | +4.21% |
Volatility
FAMFX vs. NESGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) is 4.49%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) has a volatility of 10.96%. This indicates that FAMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAMFX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 10.96% | -6.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 22.87% | -10.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.67% | 35.07% | -14.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 29.08% | -10.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.49% | 25.51% | -6.02% |