FAMFX vs. NEAIX
FAMFX (FAM Small Cap Fund) and NEAIX (Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FAMFX returned 0.97%/yr vs 24.24%/yr for NEAIX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAMFX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for NEAIX.
Performance
FAMFX vs. NEAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAMFX achieves a -6.70% return, which is significantly lower than NEAIX's 64.46% return.
FAMFX
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- -6.70%
- 6M
- -8.44%
- 1Y
- -14.56%
- 3Y*
- 1.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 6.76%
NEAIX
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 11.49%
- YTD
- 64.46%
- 6M
- 61.98%
- 1Y
- 95.22%
- 3Y*
- 40.19%
- 5Y*
- 24.24%
- 10Y*
- —
FAMFX vs. NEAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | -6.70% | -11.60% | 12.43% | 20.10% | -12.42% | 27.72% | 10.10% | 26.89% | -8.54% | 4.56% |
NEAIX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class | 64.46% | 26.99% | 14.86% | 38.37% | -27.02% | 38.46% | 52.49% | 44.68% | -15.64% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAMFX and NEAIX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAMFX and NEAIX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAMFX vs. NEAIX — Risk / Return Rank
FAMFX
NEAIX
FAMFX vs. NEAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) and Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAMFX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.54 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 6.90 | -7.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 27.14 | -28.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAMFX vs. NEAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAMFX drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, which is greater than NEAIX's maximum drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMFX and NEAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAMFX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.66% | -35.93% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.23% | -13.98% | -8.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.71% | -28.21% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.71% | -35.93% | +7.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.19% | 0.00% | -24.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.01% | -8.56% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.30% | 3.55% | +8.75% |
Volatility
FAMFX vs. NEAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) is 4.29%, while Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class (NEAIX) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that FAMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAMFX | NEAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 11.64% | -7.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 22.14% | -9.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.59% | 27.35% | -9.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 24.93% | -6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 24.74% | -5.20% |
FAMFX vs. NEAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAMFX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than NEAIX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAMFX vs. NEAIX - Dividend Comparison
FAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than NEAIX's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | 3.65% | 3.41% | 4.43% | 6.44% | 0.36% | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 10.85% | 2.15% | 2.99% | 0.24% |
NEAIX Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Institutional Class | 1.22% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.84% | 3.80% | 10.42% | 16.35% | 5.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAMFX and NEAIX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEAIX has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to FAMFX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMFX dropped -39.66% vs NEAIX's -35.93%.
NEAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAMFX and NEAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer