FAMFX vs. NBGIX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FAMFX (FAM Small Cap Fund) and NBGIX (Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FAMFX returned 6.85%/yr vs 9.72%/yr for NBGIX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAMFX charges 1.27%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for NBGIX.

Performance

FAMFX vs. NBGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAMFX achieves a -5.96% return, which is significantly lower than NBGIX's 9.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMFX has underperformed NBGIX with an annualized return of 6.85%, while NBGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.72% annualized return.

FAMFX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: -5.96%
• 6M: -8.17%
• 1Y: -15.04%
• 3Y*: 1.39%
• 5Y*: 0.99%
• 10Y*: 6.85%

NBGIX

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 3.34%
• YTD: 9.20%
• 6M: 6.70%
• 1Y: 8.79%
• 3Y*: 7.06%
• 5Y*: 3.09%
• 10Y*: 9.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAMFX vs. NBGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund	-5.96%	-11.60%	12.43%	20.10%	-12.42%	27.72%	10.10%	26.89%	-8.54%	4.56%
NBGIX Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class	9.20%	-4.55%	9.20%	15.73%	-19.35%	18.25%	25.07%	29.68%	-6.76%	16.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FAMFX and NBGIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2012	0.88

The correlation between FAMFX and NBGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FAMFX vs. NBGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAMFX

FAMFX Risk / Return Rank: 1
FAMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FAMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FAMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FAMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FAMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

NBGIX

NBGIX Risk / Return Rank: 9
NBGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
NBGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
NBGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
NBGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
NBGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAMFX vs. NBGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAMFX	NBGIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.80	0.61	-1.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.10	1.03	-2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.11	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.63	0.92	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.13	2.45	-3.57

FAMFX vs. NBGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAMFX Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the NBGIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAMFX and NBGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAMFX vs. NBGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAMFX drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, smaller than the maximum NBGIX drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMFX and NBGIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAMFX	NBGIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.66%	-51.62%	+11.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.23%	-10.75%	-11.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.71%	-27.48%	-1.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.71%	-28.27%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.66%	-34.53%	-5.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.58%	-6.85%	-16.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.01%	-7.47%	+1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.35%	4.02%	+8.33%

Volatility

FAMFX vs. NBGIX - Volatility Comparison

FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) have volatilities of 4.35% and 4.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAMFX	NBGIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	4.50%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.98%	11.58%	+1.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.58%	16.30%	+1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.76%	19.70%	-0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.52%	20.21%	-0.69%

FAMFX vs. NBGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAMFX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than NBGIX's 0.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAMFX vs. NBGIX - Dividend Comparison

FAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than NBGIX's 15.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund	3.63%	3.41%	4.43%	6.44%	0.36%	6.55%	0.00%	0.47%	10.85%	2.15%	2.99%	0.24%
NBGIX Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class	15.03%	16.41%	2.14%	3.13%	11.11%	10.91%	3.87%	6.00%	12.49%	14.10%	6.53%	11.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAMFX and NBGIX in my portfolio?

FAMFX and NBGIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAMFX or NBGIX?

NBGIX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to FAMFX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMFX dropped -39.66% vs NBGIX's -51.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.