FAMFX vs. DMCRX
FAMFX (FAM Small Cap Fund) and DMCRX (Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FAMFX returned 6.76%/yr vs 23.16%/yr for DMCRX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAMFX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for DMCRX.
Performance
FAMFX vs. DMCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAMFX achieves a -6.70% return, which is significantly lower than DMCRX's 29.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMFX has underperformed DMCRX with an annualized return of 6.76%, while DMCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.16% annualized return.
FAMFX
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- -6.70%
- 6M
- -8.44%
- 1Y
- -14.56%
- 3Y*
- 1.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 6.76%
DMCRX
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 5.02%
- YTD
- 29.20%
- 6M
- 25.97%
- 1Y
- 81.98%
- 3Y*
- 31.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 23.16%
FAMFX vs. DMCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | -6.70% | -11.60% | 12.43% | 20.10% | -12.42% | 27.72% | 10.10% | 26.89% | -8.54% | 4.56% |
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund | 29.20% | 31.17% | 30.58% | 11.47% | -33.54% | 22.23% | 86.43% | 34.03% | 2.52% | 24.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAMFX and DMCRX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAMFX and DMCRX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAMFX vs. DMCRX — Risk / Return Rank
FAMFX
DMCRX
FAMFX vs. DMCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAMFX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.43 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 5.44 | -6.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 18.89 | -19.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAMFX vs. DMCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAMFX drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, smaller than the maximum DMCRX drawdown of -46.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMFX and DMCRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAMFX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.66% | -46.68% | +7.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.23% | -15.46% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.71% | -34.92% | +6.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.71% | -46.68% | +17.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.66% | -46.68% | +7.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.19% | 0.00% | -24.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.01% | -14.80% | +8.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.30% | 4.44% | +7.86% |
Volatility
FAMFX vs. DMCRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) is 4.29%, while Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that FAMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAMFX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 10.43% | -6.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 22.58% | -9.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.59% | 29.71% | -12.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 28.65% | -9.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 28.05% | -8.51% |
FAMFX vs. DMCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAMFX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than DMCRX's 1.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAMFX vs. DMCRX - Dividend Comparison
FAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than DMCRX's 10.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund | 10.62% | 13.72% | 3.86% | 0.87% | 8.20% | 48.23% | 19.79% | 14.70% | 33.22% | 8.91% | 0.00% | 4.20% |
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | 3.65% | 3.41% | 4.43% | 6.44% | 0.36% | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 10.85% | 2.15% | 2.99% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAMFX and DMCRX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DMCRX has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to FAMFX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMFX dropped -39.66% vs DMCRX's -46.68%.
DMCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAMFX and DMCRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer